Ulf Ringertz

DOI Number: N/A

Conference number: IFASD-2019-140

The design, analysis and structural testing of a new wing for a flutter wind tunnel model is considered. The aircraft configuration represents a modern light weight fighter configuration with external stores. A first test in the Transonic Dynamics Tunnel (TDT) at NASA Langley was performed in 2016 and the upcoming second test is planned for 2020. During the first test program, a large amount of static aeroelastic data was acquired both in air and heavy gas (R134a) and also some dynamic data. Flutter testing was also performed but only two flutter conditions were achieved before model damage. For the second test, a new wing structural design is being developed in order to allow flutter testing also without under-wing external stores and without significant mass balancing. However, in order to maintain sufficient structural strength, design optimization is required. The new design is to maintain the same strength as the first design tested but with much lower flutter dynamic pressure in transonic conditions. The strength requirements are considered using structural testing in combination with linear elastic finite element analysis. The design process has demonstrated that changing the composite layup will have a very significant influence on the predicted flutter dynamic pressure without loss of strength. By using a mix of glass-fiber weave with a few layers of uni-directional glass-fiber and tailoring of the fiber orientation, a sufficiently large reduction in flutter dynamic pressure can be obtained.

Read the full paper here

Email
Print
LinkedIn
The paper above was part of  proceedings of a CEAS event and as such the author has signed a publication agreement to have their paper published in the repository. In the case this paper is found somewhere else CEAS always links to the other source.  CEAS takes great care in making the correct content available to the reader. If any mistakes are found  in the listings please contact us directly at papers@aerospacerepository.org and we will correct the listing promptly.  CEAS cannot be held liable either for mistakes in editorial or technical aspects, nor for omissions, nor for the correctness of the content. In particular, CEAS does not guarantee completeness or correctness of information contained in external websites which can be accessed via links from CEAS’s websites. Despite accurate research on the content of such linked external websites, CEAS cannot be held liable for their content. Only the content providers of such external sites are liable for their content. Should you notice any mistake in technical or editorial aspects of the CEAS site, please do not hesitate to inform us.