Kim, T.,

DOI Number: N/A

Conference number: IFASD-2019-001

During the design and analysis of aircraft flutter boundaries are typically computed using the p-k iterations, k iterations, p iterations, or eigenvalue analysis, that require computationally expensive and numerically sensitive procedures especially for complex configurations. In this work, the Dynamic Eigen Decomposition (DED) and a frequency domain stability theorem developed previously will be applied to a coupled CFD-CSD simulation to predict the aircraft flutter. It is known that the dynamic eigenmodes (DE) of the aeroelastic system are an intrinsic property of the system independent of dynamic pressure and flutter mode is identical to one of the DEs. Thus, the aeroelastic instability can be predicted by simply extrapolating the corresponding dynamic eigenvalues obtained at low, subcritical dynamic pressures. We will extend the theory to show that this is also true in the case of two parameters where air speed as well as air density vary. The proposed scheme is applied to computationally simulated flight data of F-16 wing model with a bending and a torsion mode shape subjected to a vertical gust in a transonic flow. It is shown that the new approach produces very accurate flutter predictions with the gust response. It is also shown that the single parameter variation of dynamic pressure based on a mean, constant speed of sound can yield sufficiently accurate flutter results.

Read the full paper here

Email
Print
LinkedIn
The paper above was part of  proceedings of a CEAS event and as such the author has signed a publication agreement to have their paper published in the repository. In the case this paper is found somewhere else CEAS always links to the other source.  CEAS takes great care in making the correct content available to the reader. If any mistakes are found  in the listings please contact us directly at papers@aerospacerepository.org and we will correct the listing promptly.  CEAS cannot be held liable either for mistakes in editorial or technical aspects, nor for omissions, nor for the correctness of the content. In particular, CEAS does not guarantee completeness or correctness of information contained in external websites which can be accessed via links from CEAS’s websites. Despite accurate research on the content of such linked external websites, CEAS cannot be held liable for their content. Only the content providers of such external sites are liable for their content. Should you notice any mistake in technical or editorial aspects of the CEAS site, please do not hesitate to inform us.