A.C.L.M van Rooij, J. Nitzsche, R.P. Dwight

DOI Number: N/A

Conference number: IFASD-2015-166

Aeroelastic limit-cycle oscillations due to aerodynamic non-linearities are usually investigated using coupled fluid-structure interaction simulations in the time domain. These simulations can become computationally expensive, especially if the global bifurcation behaviour is of interest. To reduce the computational effort of parameter studies, an extension of the well-known p-k method is developed. In this frequency domain method, the aerodynamic forces and moments are now not only dependent on the frequency, but also on the oscillation amplitudes and the phase angle between the degrees of freedom. The first harmonic components of the aerodynamic forces are interpolated in the parameter space applying response surface modelling. The limit-cycle oscillation amplitude and mode shape are then found iteratively. The amplitude-dependent p-k method is verified and validated using an analytical testcase; the two-degree-of-freedom van der Pol oscillator. Excellent agreement with the time domain solution and the analytical solution is obtained. The amplitude-dependent p-k method is then applied to a two-degree-of-freedom airfoil system where the aerodynamic forces are computed from Euler simulations. Fluid-structure interaction simulations are performed for validation of the method. Both methods show good agreement in the bifurcation behaviour of the limit-cycle oscillation amplitude and mode shape.

Read the full paper here

Email
Print
LinkedIn
The paper above was part of  proceedings of a CEAS event and as such the author has signed a publication agreement to have their paper published in the repository. In the case this paper is found somewhere else CEAS always links to the other source.  CEAS takes great care in making the correct content available to the reader. If any mistakes are found  in the listings please contact us directly at papers@aerospacerepository.org and we will correct the listing promptly.  CEAS cannot be held liable either for mistakes in editorial or technical aspects, nor for omissions, nor for the correctness of the content. In particular, CEAS does not guarantee completeness or correctness of information contained in external websites which can be accessed via links from CEAS’s websites. Despite accurate research on the content of such linked external websites, CEAS cannot be held liable for their content. Only the content providers of such external sites are liable for their content. Should you notice any mistake in technical or editorial aspects of the CEAS site, please do not hesitate to inform us.