Maximilian Winter, Christian Breitsamter

DOI Number: N/A

Conference number: IFASD-2017-217

In the present work, different nonlinear reduced-order modeling (ROM) approaches are employed to assess their performance and efficiency for unsteady aerodynamic computations. The ROM techniques are applied to a complex aircraft model in order to indicate their potential for industrial applications. On the one hand, a neurofuzzy-model-based ROM is employed to compute the aerodynamic response due to small-amplitude motions across variable angles of attack. On the other hand, the unsteady surface pressure distribution is predicted by combining system identification methods with the proper orthogonal decomposition (POD). For demonstrations purposes, NASA’s common research model (CRM) configuration is investigated at transonic flow conditions, while forced-motion computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations are carried out to obtain the aerodynamic responses induced by structural modeshape-based deflections. It is shown that the presented methods can be applied to speed-up multidisciplinary analyses with respect to industry-relevant configurations.

Read the full paper here

In Categories: 1.Events, IFASD 2017, Reduced Order Modeling
Email
Print
LinkedIn
The paper above was part of  proceedings of a CEAS event and as such the author has signed a publication agreement to have their paper published in the repository. In the case this paper is found somewhere else CEAS always links to the other source.  CEAS takes great care in making the correct content available to the reader. If any mistakes are found  in the listings please contact us directly at papers@aerospacerepository.org and we will correct the listing promptly.  CEAS cannot be held liable either for mistakes in editorial or technical aspects, nor for omissions, nor for the correctness of the content. In particular, CEAS does not guarantee completeness or correctness of information contained in external websites which can be accessed via links from CEAS’s websites. Despite accurate research on the content of such linked external websites, CEAS cannot be held liable for their content. Only the content providers of such external sites are liable for their content. Should you notice any mistake in technical or editorial aspects of the CEAS site, please do not hesitate to inform us.