Markus Ritter, Jessica Jones, Carlos E. S. Cesnik

DOI Number: N/A

Conference number: IFASD-2017-171

A recently proposed method that extends the classical modal approach captures geometrically nonlinear effects in large structural deflections. The extensions account for nonlinear force displacement relationship by generalized quadratic and cubic stiffness terms and a geometrically nonlinear displacement field by quadratic, cubic, and fourth-order mode components. These extensions make the method particularly suitable for aeroelastic applications involving highly flexible structures and nonlinearities due to nonconservative loads. In this work, the method is enhanced by rigid body degrees of freedom to simulate a maneuvering, very flexible aircraft. Special emphasis is put on the derivation of a set of coupled differential equations of motion in which as few assumptions as possible are made with respect to structural deformations. The use of the mean-axes constraints is explicitely avoided, all inertial and gyroscopic coupling terms between rigid body and elastic motion are included. The setup of the aeroelastic framework based on an unsteady vortex-lattice method in the time doamin is presented in detail. University of Michigan’s X-HALE UAV is the test case of this work. The results of dynamic maneuvers including tail input scenarios and gust encounters are presented and compared with results from UM/NAST.

Read the full paper here

Email
Print
LinkedIn
The paper above was part of  proceedings of a CEAS event and as such the author has signed a publication agreement to have their paper published in the repository. In the case this paper is found somewhere else CEAS always links to the other source.  CEAS takes great care in making the correct content available to the reader. If any mistakes are found  in the listings please contact us directly at papers@aerospacerepository.org and we will correct the listing promptly.  CEAS cannot be held liable either for mistakes in editorial or technical aspects, nor for omissions, nor for the correctness of the content. In particular, CEAS does not guarantee completeness or correctness of information contained in external websites which can be accessed via links from CEAS’s websites. Despite accurate research on the content of such linked external websites, CEAS cannot be held liable for their content. Only the content providers of such external sites are liable for their content. Should you notice any mistake in technical or editorial aspects of the CEAS site, please do not hesitate to inform us.