Javon C. Farao, Arnaud G. Malan, Francesco Gambioli

DOI Number: N/A

Conference number: IFASD-2017-064

This study details the development of a computational full aircraft model (FAM) to assess the non-linear response of an aircraft during an aerodynamic gust. A FAM comprises numerous components viz., the structure, aerodynamics and inertial loads. The focus of this study is to implement a geometrically non-linear reduced-order model (ROM) for the wing and assess its aeroelastic response against standard linear approaches. The NASA common research model (CRM) wing is modeled by three-dimensional Timoshenko beam elements in both the linear and non-linear regime. Linear responses are derived from standard linear modal analysis procedures. The geometrically non-linear beam element ROM is solved via quadratic mode shape components in the modal domain. These components are extracted from linear mode shapes in a novel approach for elastic beam elements. A representative gust load is applied to the structure and the responses are compared to the linear approach. It was found that QMS modal methodology offers improved accuracy by retaining the overall wing length even when loading produces a vertical displacement of 35% with respect to wing span. The extension caused by linear modeling exceeds 14%, while the QMS approach reduces it to less than 3%.

Read the full paper here

Email
Print
LinkedIn
The paper above was part of  proceedings of a CEAS event and as such the author has signed a publication agreement to have their paper published in the repository. In the case this paper is found somewhere else CEAS always links to the other source.  CEAS takes great care in making the correct content available to the reader. If any mistakes are found  in the listings please contact us directly at papers@aerospacerepository.org and we will correct the listing promptly.  CEAS cannot be held liable either for mistakes in editorial or technical aspects, nor for omissions, nor for the correctness of the content. In particular, CEAS does not guarantee completeness or correctness of information contained in external websites which can be accessed via links from CEAS’s websites. Despite accurate research on the content of such linked external websites, CEAS cannot be held liable for their content. Only the content providers of such external sites are liable for their content. Should you notice any mistake in technical or editorial aspects of the CEAS site, please do not hesitate to inform us.