Oddvar O. Bendiksen

DOI Number: N/A

Conference number: IFASD-2017-015

Multiple or nested limit cycle oscillations (LCOs) were first observed in wind tunnel tests of an unswept supercritical wing in transonic flow, restricted by the supports to two degrees of freedom (pitch and plunge). In this case the flow was essentially two-dimensional, and the coexistence of two LCOs of different amplitudes can be explained in terms of the transition from Tijdeman Type A to Type B shock motion, which limits the energy flow from the fluid to the structure. For a highly nonsymmetrical wing, the transitions on the upper and lower surfaces will occur at different amplitudes, resulting in nested limit cycles. Recent computational results suggest that nested limit cycles should occur for most transonic wings, if the wings exhibit LCO-type flutter near Mach 1. In this paper, results are presented for flutter cases where 3 nested limit cycles are present in the transonic region. Possible physical mechanisms responsible for multiple LCOs are discussed, as are the computational and experimental implications. Calculations indicate that at some Mach numbers one or more of the nested LCOs may become unstable and eventually disappear by “morphing” into neighboring LCOs. The outer LCO is also susceptible to amplitude instabilities and may gradually transition into strong flutter. In a wind tunnel or flight test this could be dangerous, because a small change in Mach number or dynamic pressure could transform a benign LCO into hard flutter. These observations also have important computational implications in code verification and validation.

Read the full paper here

Email
Print
LinkedIn
The paper above was part of  proceedings of a CEAS event and as such the author has signed a publication agreement to have their paper published in the repository. In the case this paper is found somewhere else CEAS always links to the other source.  CEAS takes great care in making the correct content available to the reader. If any mistakes are found  in the listings please contact us directly at papers@aerospacerepository.org and we will correct the listing promptly.  CEAS cannot be held liable either for mistakes in editorial or technical aspects, nor for omissions, nor for the correctness of the content. In particular, CEAS does not guarantee completeness or correctness of information contained in external websites which can be accessed via links from CEAS’s websites. Despite accurate research on the content of such linked external websites, CEAS cannot be held liable for their content. Only the content providers of such external sites are liable for their content. Should you notice any mistake in technical or editorial aspects of the CEAS site, please do not hesitate to inform us.