M.Argaman, D.E.Raveh

DOI Number: N/A

Conference number: IFASD-2017-007

The paper presents a computational methodology for CFD-based flutter analysis that is based on system identification of the aeroelastic system at few sub-critical dynamic pressures. Autoregressive Exogenous (ARX) models of the aeroelastic system are estimated based on simulated aeroelastic modal responses to prescribed excitation of time-varying vertical velocities. A linear stability parameter of the system is computed for each dynamic pressure, and, by extrapolation, points to the flutter conditions. The method was demonstrated on three test cases of subsonic airfoil flutter (2 DOF plunge and pitch aeroelastic system), transonic airfoil flutter (2 DOF plunge and pitch aeroelastic system), and a generic transport aircraft at subsonic flow, with flutter mechanism involving three structural modes. In all cases the method resulted in accurate predication of the flutter point as compared to either full CFD aeroelastic simulation, or wind tunnel test results. The method is computationally efficient, as it only requires a single aeroelastic simulation, at two to three dynamic pressure values, to predict the flutter point (for each Mach number). The paper describes the methodology, and discusses the details of its application, its advantages, and shortcomings.

Read the full paper here

Email
Print
LinkedIn
The paper above was part of  proceedings of a CEAS event and as such the author has signed a publication agreement to have their paper published in the repository. In the case this paper is found somewhere else CEAS always links to the other source.  CEAS takes great care in making the correct content available to the reader. If any mistakes are found  in the listings please contact us directly at papers@aerospacerepository.org and we will correct the listing promptly.  CEAS cannot be held liable either for mistakes in editorial or technical aspects, nor for omissions, nor for the correctness of the content. In particular, CEAS does not guarantee completeness or correctness of information contained in external websites which can be accessed via links from CEAS’s websites. Despite accurate research on the content of such linked external websites, CEAS cannot be held liable for their content. Only the content providers of such external sites are liable for their content. Should you notice any mistake in technical or editorial aspects of the CEAS site, please do not hesitate to inform us.