Hung-Yen CHOU, Hsien-Hao TENG

DOI Number: XXX-YYY-ZZZ

Conference number: HiSST2024-00230

The aerodynamic coefficient of AGARD-B model is measured in wind tunnel. According to the definition, the total drag is the sum of fore body drag and base drag. To calculate the fore body drag precisely, the base pressure data must be measured accurately. In this test, the base drag was found apparently much higher than other tests performed by Arnold Engineering Development Center (AEDC) in USA and Advisory Group for Aerospace Research and Development (AGARD) in Europe. To correct this error, the static pressure data at the model support position must be measured by static-pressure probe. After re-calculation, both the base drag and fore body drag have been in the region offered from AGARD publications. Furthermore, the coefficient is validated to the result from CFD Simulation, and the data is within the tolerance range. The numerical simulations were performed using ANSYS Fluent 2023, and a structured mesh with near wall treatment and the κ-ω SST turbulence models. Proceed to the next step, the flow topologies over the AGARD-B model at Mach 0.80, 0.95, 1.05, and 1.2. According to the experiment data and flow-field simulation, the vortex bursting occurs along with the decrease of lift. When vortex bursting happens, there’s a recovery shock that exists between the primary and secondary vortex, and a lack of shock is observed between the wing and vortex. As the angle of attack or Mach number increases, the vortex bursting location would be different, which need to be replicated in wind tunnel using the additional equipment if possible.

Read the full paper here

Email
Print
LinkedIn
The paper above was part of  proceedings of a CEAS event and as such the author has signed a publication agreement to have their paper published in the repository. In the case this paper is found somewhere else CEAS always links to the other source.  CEAS takes great care in making the correct content available to the reader. If any mistakes are found  in the listings please contact us directly at papers@aerospacerepository.org and we will correct the listing promptly.  CEAS cannot be held liable either for mistakes in editorial or technical aspects, nor for omissions, nor for the correctness of the content. In particular, CEAS does not guarantee completeness or correctness of information contained in external websites which can be accessed via links from CEAS’s websites. Despite accurate research on the content of such linked external websites, CEAS cannot be held liable for their content. Only the content providers of such external sites are liable for their content. Should you notice any mistake in technical or editorial aspects of the CEAS site, please do not hesitate to inform us.