Chanho KIM, Yosheph YANG, Jae Gang KIM, Kyu Hong KIM

DOI Number: XXX-YYY-ZZZ

Conference number: HiSST 2024-00162

In hypersonic computational fluid dynamics studies, using a two-temperature model to simulate thermochemical non-equilibrium states is common. The two-temperature model assumes translational-rotational, electron-electronic-vibrational temperatures and includes the assumption that each energy has an equal temperature. In this study, the temperature of each energy mode was separated and the effects were analyzed. The three-temperature model uses translational-rotational, vibrational, and electron-electronic temperatures by independently calculating the electron-electronic temperature from the two-temperature model. The four-temperature model calculated the rotational temperature independently. To accurately calculate the electron-electronic temperature, not only the Lee model but also the Laporta model was used to model the e-V relaxation time of N2,O2,NO. The validation of the multi-temperature model solver was performed by comparing the heat flux of ELECTRE, LENS-XX experiments, and the electron number density of RAM-C. The effect of the multi-temperature model is most pronounced in the wake region, where the flow expands and affects the formation of ions and electrons.

Read the full paper here

Email
Print
LinkedIn
The paper above was part of  proceedings of a CEAS event and as such the author has signed a publication agreement to have their paper published in the repository. In the case this paper is found somewhere else CEAS always links to the other source.  CEAS takes great care in making the correct content available to the reader. If any mistakes are found  in the listings please contact us directly at papers@aerospacerepository.org and we will correct the listing promptly.  CEAS cannot be held liable either for mistakes in editorial or technical aspects, nor for omissions, nor for the correctness of the content. In particular, CEAS does not guarantee completeness or correctness of information contained in external websites which can be accessed via links from CEAS’s websites. Despite accurate research on the content of such linked external websites, CEAS cannot be held liable for their content. Only the content providers of such external sites are liable for their content. Should you notice any mistake in technical or editorial aspects of the CEAS site, please do not hesitate to inform us.