Chihiro Fujio, Hideaki Ogawa

DOI Number XXX-YYY-ZZZ

Conference Number HiSST-2022-437

Design of scramjet intakes requires sophisticated methodologies to achieve desirable compression reducing total pressure loss and drag simultaneously, and multi-objective design optimization (MDO) using
evolutionary algorithms (EA) is one of the most promising approaches. In addition, the dataset obtained
from computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations in the MDO process can serve expected as a rich
mine of physics-based information. However, the substantial computational cost of a large number of
CFD evaluations represents an obstacle to high-fidelity design search. The present study proposes an
evolutionary algorithm which employs a multi-dimensional flow prediction model via deep learning for
objective/constraint function evaluations to replace CFD simulation by predicting flowfields inside scramjet intakes. The proposed EA-based MDO framework is applied to an optimization study of axisymmetric
3-ramp intakes and the performance and utility are discussed. This EA approach using multi-dimensional
predictive modeling is applicable for various optimization problems which require reduction of the computational cost of function evaluations.

Read the full paper >

Email
Print
LinkedIn
The paper above was part of  proceedings of a CEAS event and as such the author has signed a publication agreement to have their paper published in the repository. In the case this paper is found somewhere else CEAS always links to the other source.  CEAS takes great care in making the correct content available to the reader. If any mistakes are found  in the listings please contact us directly at papers@aerospacerepository.org and we will correct the listing promptly.  CEAS cannot be held liable either for mistakes in editorial or technical aspects, nor for omissions, nor for the correctness of the content. In particular, CEAS does not guarantee completeness or correctness of information contained in external websites which can be accessed via links from CEAS’s websites. Despite accurate research on the content of such linked external websites, CEAS cannot be held liable for their content. Only the content providers of such external sites are liable for their content. Should you notice any mistake in technical or editorial aspects of the CEAS site, please do not hesitate to inform us.