David HENNEAUX, Achraf EL HARFOCH, Pierre SCHROOYEN, Julien KLAUNER, Bruno BARROS DIAS, Bernd HELBER, Thierry MAGIN, Louis WALPOT

DOI Number: N/A

Conference number: HiSST-2025-083

The destructive re-entry of space debris such as upper-stage launchers and non-operational satellites involves a wide range of coupled thermo-chemical and thermo-mechanical ablation processes. Within the Design for Demise (D4D) paradigm, ensuring that disintegration leads to an admissible on-ground casualty probability requires a reliable prediction capability for these complex phenomena. Among the materials of concern, glassy components—commonly used in high-precision optics and scientific instruments—pose a particular challenge, as their ablation behavior involves melting, shear removal, and evaporation, with the coexistence of gas, liquid, and solid phases. A critical aspect of this behavior is the evaporation process and the subsequent injection of vaporized species into the surrounding high-temperature reactive flow, both of which remain insufficiently understood and difficult to model with confidence. In this work, we develop advanced models and numerical strategies to describe these processes in detail. The governing equations are formulated for each phase, and the interface balances that couple them are derived with particular emphasis on evaporation modeling. A staggered coupling strategy is implemented to carry out simulations of a VKI’s Plasmatron experiment performed on a quartz sample, representative of glassy materials. The numerical results demonstrate good to very good agreement with experimental measurements, despite the complexity and multi-physics nature of the problem. The simulations provide new insight into the interplay between evaporation and the injection of species into the surrounding flow, shedding light on mechanisms that strongly influence the ablation rate. These results constitute a first validation of the proposed physical models and numerical methodology, and they open the way for broader application under different conditions. Future work will include sensitivity analyses to identify key parameters, as well as the consideration of more complex evaporation mechanisms to refine predictive capabilities for D4D applications.

Read the full paper here

Email
Print
LinkedIn
The paper above was part of  proceedings of a CEAS event and as such the author has signed a publication agreement to have their paper published in the repository. In the case this paper is found somewhere else CEAS always links to the other source.  CEAS takes great care in making the correct content available to the reader. If any mistakes are found  in the listings please contact us directly at papers@aerospacerepository.org and we will correct the listing promptly.  CEAS cannot be held liable either for mistakes in editorial or technical aspects, nor for omissions, nor for the correctness of the content. In particular, CEAS does not guarantee completeness or correctness of information contained in external websites which can be accessed via links from CEAS’s websites. Despite accurate research on the content of such linked external websites, CEAS cannot be held liable for their content. Only the content providers of such external sites are liable for their content. Should you notice any mistake in technical or editorial aspects of the CEAS site, please do not hesitate to inform us.