Thomas ZIELINSKI, José CARDESA, Guillaume BEGOU, Jean-Philippe BRAZIER, Laurent MUSCAT, Marina OLAZABAL-LOUMÉ

DOI Number: N/A

Conference number: HiSST-2025-174

Boundary layer transition is of particular interest in the prediction of the aerodynamic performances and maneuverability of a given hypersonic vehicle. However, it has been found to be highly sensitive to flow parameters such as the Mach number, unit Reynolds number, cross-flow effects and wall temperature. Besides, from a numerical point of view, it is particularly difficult to obtain representative boundary-layer profiles to understand and then model these effects on the dominant instability modes. In this paper, a methodology relying on metric-based mesh adaptation has been validated and applied to address these issues. More specifically, the effects of the unit freestream Reynolds number, the wall temperature ratio Tw/Tr and the angle of attack on various boundary layer profiles and the typical instability waves (cross-flow instability, first and second Mack modes) for a sharp 7-degree cone geometry are investigated. It has been observed that the increase in unit Reynolds number destabilizes all modes. Moreover, it was shown that the ratio Tw/Tr has a drastic effect on these modes. Indeed, although the second Mack mode is strongly destabilized when lowering the Tw/Tr ratio, the highly oblique modes behaved in the opposite fashion, being strongly destabilized with an increase of Tw/Tr. Below Tw/Tr ≈ 0.3, the first mode became completely stable and the crossflow mode was always unstable for all the chosen Tw/Tr values. Finally, it has been found that the angle of attack significantly destabilized the crossflow instability by increasing the values of |wmax/Ue| and the variation of edge quantities across the flowfield due to a stronger azimuthal pressure gradient induced by the curved bow shock.

Read the full paper here

Email
Print
LinkedIn
The paper above was part of  proceedings of a CEAS event and as such the author has signed a publication agreement to have their paper published in the repository. In the case this paper is found somewhere else CEAS always links to the other source.  CEAS takes great care in making the correct content available to the reader. If any mistakes are found  in the listings please contact us directly at papers@aerospacerepository.org and we will correct the listing promptly.  CEAS cannot be held liable either for mistakes in editorial or technical aspects, nor for omissions, nor for the correctness of the content. In particular, CEAS does not guarantee completeness or correctness of information contained in external websites which can be accessed via links from CEAS’s websites. Despite accurate research on the content of such linked external websites, CEAS cannot be held liable for their content. Only the content providers of such external sites are liable for their content. Should you notice any mistake in technical or editorial aspects of the CEAS site, please do not hesitate to inform us.