Kate RHOADS, Kristen PRICE, Stefan LOEHLE, Savio POOVATHINGAL, Alexandre MARTIN

DOI Number: N/A

Conference number: HiSST-2025-307

Ablative thermal protection systems (TPS) are used during atmospheric entry to mitigate thermal energy transport to the substructure of spacecraft through material degradation. In order to better understand in-depth material changes due to volumetric ablation, previously tested samples were re-exposed to a pure oxygen environment in the High Enthalpy Low-Cost Multi-Use Torch (HELMUT) facility at the University of Kentucky. Additionally, PICA samples were tested to investigate the impact phenolic resin has on the material response. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was conducted on disconnected fibers that remained on the samples after flow exposure to investigate in-depth fiber and binder pitting. Material response across test campaigns was compared to evaluate changes in structural integrity caused by in-depth oxidation, which is suspected to affect spallation behavior. Re-exposure produced higher percent volume loss, greater percent mass loss, and a reduction in density. PICA samples produced a negligible fiber layer, and a lower percent volume loss. These findings indicate that FiberForm tested in the HELMUT facility could be operating in a reaction-limited regime, with substantial oxygen penetration beneath the surface. This methodology also establishes a framework for providing degree of char estimates for material response models, and highlights the role phenolic resin has on structural integrity.

Read the full paper here

Email
Print
LinkedIn
The paper above was part of  proceedings of a CEAS event and as such the author has signed a publication agreement to have their paper published in the repository. In the case this paper is found somewhere else CEAS always links to the other source.  CEAS takes great care in making the correct content available to the reader. If any mistakes are found  in the listings please contact us directly at papers@aerospacerepository.org and we will correct the listing promptly.  CEAS cannot be held liable either for mistakes in editorial or technical aspects, nor for omissions, nor for the correctness of the content. In particular, CEAS does not guarantee completeness or correctness of information contained in external websites which can be accessed via links from CEAS’s websites. Despite accurate research on the content of such linked external websites, CEAS cannot be held liable for their content. Only the content providers of such external sites are liable for their content. Should you notice any mistake in technical or editorial aspects of the CEAS site, please do not hesitate to inform us.