Cyrille Stephan, Xavier Amandolese

DOI Number: N/A

Conference number: IFASD-2024-160

Increasing the aspect ratio of wings may have beneficial effects in terms of aerodynamics, such as a higher lift on drag ratio. However, High-Aspect-Ratio Wings (HARW) also
have a natural flexibility that can make them prone to aeroelastic instabilities for specific flight conditions. Unfortunately, computing the flutter-free domains of these HARWs is tricky due to the onset of nonlinear phenomena present for high amplitudes of wing deflections. In that context, this paper presents the study of a taut-strip flexible wing model, particularly designed to experience flutter in a wind tunnel at low-to-moderate Reynolds numbers. The objective was to keep the structural complexity as low as possible, while exhibiting fluid-structure interactions typically observed for these types of wings. The choice of structural design was based on the numerical prediction coming from a low-order aeroelastic model combining beam theory and simplified aerodynamics. The choice of structural design was based on the numerical prediction coming from a linear
low-order aeroelastic model combining beam theory and simplified aerodynamics. Thanks to dynamical tests in laboratory, structural parameters (inertia, stiffness, damping coefficients) were used to update the numerical model. Using this linear model, a flutter involving a coupling between the 2nd bending mode and the 1st torsion mode was expected in the velocity range of the wind tunnel. Wind tunnel tests however show an earlier flutter bifurcation involving flapwise, chordwise and torsion motions, for which the route to flutter and post-critical limitcycle oscillations have been measured by non-contact techniques.

Read the full paper here

Email
Print
LinkedIn
The paper above was part of  proceedings of a CEAS event and as such the author has signed a publication agreement to have their paper published in the repository. In the case this paper is found somewhere else CEAS always links to the other source.  CEAS takes great care in making the correct content available to the reader. If any mistakes are found  in the listings please contact us directly at papers@aerospacerepository.org and we will correct the listing promptly.  CEAS cannot be held liable either for mistakes in editorial or technical aspects, nor for omissions, nor for the correctness of the content. In particular, CEAS does not guarantee completeness or correctness of information contained in external websites which can be accessed via links from CEAS’s websites. Despite accurate research on the content of such linked external websites, CEAS cannot be held liable for their content. Only the content providers of such external sites are liable for their content. Should you notice any mistake in technical or editorial aspects of the CEAS site, please do not hesitate to inform us.