Ludovic Colo, Gabriel Broux, Eric Garrigues

DOI Number: N/A

Conference number: IFASD-2019-072

Flutter is a dynamic phenomenon occurring on aircraft structures for particular flight points when structural and aerodynamic modes couple in an unstable way. This phenomenon is computed during design phases to predict the aeroelastic behaviour of the aircraft and prevent any instability in the flight domain. To solve this problem, aircraft manufacturers currently use algorithms pertaining to a family of methods labelled as the “p-k method”. These algorithms have been optimized for the flutter problem and provide quite accurate results but in the same time exhibit some flaws which can be prejudicial when one wants to fully automate the flutter analysis. New techniques to solve the non-linear eigenvalue problems such as the flutter problem have been developed recently. Based on the invariant pairs theory, they lead to more robust solutions in terms of unicity. A bloc Newton algorithm applying these techniques has been implemented, validated on standard flutter cases (both civilian and military aircraft) and tested on cases displaying convergence and unicity issues with the p-k method. The outputs present the expected behaviour despite a longer computational time. In order to keep computational times within industrial timeframe, a hybrid method, switching from p-k to block Newton “when required” has been developed. Thanks to this hybrid method implemented in Dassault Aviation in-house solver Elfini, standard flutter computations at Dassault Aviation benefit from the advantages of the invariant pairs theory.

Read the full paper here

Email
Print
LinkedIn
The paper above was part of  proceedings of a CEAS event and as such the author has signed a publication agreement to have their paper published in the repository. In the case this paper is found somewhere else CEAS always links to the other source.  CEAS takes great care in making the correct content available to the reader. If any mistakes are found  in the listings please contact us directly at papers@aerospacerepository.org and we will correct the listing promptly.  CEAS cannot be held liable either for mistakes in editorial or technical aspects, nor for omissions, nor for the correctness of the content. In particular, CEAS does not guarantee completeness or correctness of information contained in external websites which can be accessed via links from CEAS’s websites. Despite accurate research on the content of such linked external websites, CEAS cannot be held liable for their content. Only the content providers of such external sites are liable for their content. Should you notice any mistake in technical or editorial aspects of the CEAS site, please do not hesitate to inform us.