Petr G. Karkle, Michail A. Pronin, Michail M. Bogatyrev, Gleb V. Liseykin, Klaas Dijkstra

DOI Number: N/A

Conference number: IFASD-2015-140

Classical phase resonance method (PRM) with multipoint excitation was successfully used in ground vibration tests (GVT) from 60-th up to 90-th years of the 20th Century. The appearance of highly productive computers resulted in replacement of this method in majority of tests by phase separation method (SPM), which requires less testing structure occupation time but needs more data evaluation and analysis time. Due to relatively complicated data evaluation algorithms necessary for the SPM, the final results reliability is lower than in PRM. In this paper short overview of TsAGI experience in aerospace structures GVT is presented, and possible improvements of phase resonance method are discussed. The main issue is how to decrease test duration time without loss of accuracy and reliability. Under discussion is one of the possible ways, i.e. the application of feedback control of excitation force using modern data acquisition and signal generation equipment. A few examples are presented to demonstrate effectiveness and restrictions.

Read the full paper here

In Categories: 2. IFASD 2015, GVT & Flight Test
Email
Print
LinkedIn
The paper above was part of  proceedings of a CEAS event and as such the author has signed a publication agreement to have their paper published in the repository. In the case this paper is found somewhere else CEAS always links to the other source.  CEAS takes great care in making the correct content available to the reader. If any mistakes are found  in the listings please contact us directly at papers@aerospacerepository.org and we will correct the listing promptly.  CEAS cannot be held liable either for mistakes in editorial or technical aspects, nor for omissions, nor for the correctness of the content. In particular, CEAS does not guarantee completeness or correctness of information contained in external websites which can be accessed via links from CEAS’s websites. Despite accurate research on the content of such linked external websites, CEAS cannot be held liable for their content. Only the content providers of such external sites are liable for their content. Should you notice any mistake in technical or editorial aspects of the CEAS site, please do not hesitate to inform us.