Wolfgang Weigold, Bernd Stickan, Inocencio Travieso-Alvarez, Christoph Kaiser, Patrick Teufel

DOI Number: N/A

Conference number: IFASD-2017-187

For decades panel methods have been used in the industrial context to compute the unsteady aerodynamic model for gust load purposes. Additionally corrections with wind tunnel and/or steady CFD data have been applied to overcome the shortcomings of the panel methods, especially in the transonic regime. With the aim to compute a more realistic unsteady aerodynamic model without corrections, computational fluid dynamics (CFD) should replace the panel methods in the future. Due to the large computational costs of CFD, an important enabler for the direct usage of unsteady CFD in the industrial context is linearized CFD. These codes allow computing harmonic motion and harmonic gusts directly in the frequency domain, preventing expansive unsteady computations in the time domain. See [2] and [3] for the here used TAU code and the included linearized frequency domain (LFD) solver from the German Aerospace Center (DLR). In this research the complete aerodynamic model for the standard gust load process has been computed with TAU-LFD. Tau‐LFD provides frequency dependent aerodynamic data in half‐generalized form, which can be introduced in a straightforward manner into the existing standard gust process.

Read the full paper here

In Categories: 1.Events, IFASD 2017, Steady/Unsteady Aerodynamics
Email
Print
LinkedIn
The paper above was part of  proceedings of a CEAS event and as such the author has signed a publication agreement to have their paper published in the repository. In the case this paper is found somewhere else CEAS always links to the other source.  CEAS takes great care in making the correct content available to the reader. If any mistakes are found  in the listings please contact us directly at papers@aerospacerepository.org and we will correct the listing promptly.  CEAS cannot be held liable either for mistakes in editorial or technical aspects, nor for omissions, nor for the correctness of the content. In particular, CEAS does not guarantee completeness or correctness of information contained in external websites which can be accessed via links from CEAS’s websites. Despite accurate research on the content of such linked external websites, CEAS cannot be held liable for their content. Only the content providers of such external sites are liable for their content. Should you notice any mistake in technical or editorial aspects of the CEAS site, please do not hesitate to inform us.