Joaquim R. R. A. Martins, Timothy R. Brooks

DOI Number: N/A

Conference number: IFASD-2017-127

Wing shape is a crucial aircraft component that has a large impact performance. Wing design optimization has been an active area of research for several decades, but achieving practical designs has been a challenge. One of the main challenges is the wing flexibility, which requires the consideration of both aerodynamics and structures. To address this, we have developed the capability to perform simultaneous optimization of the outer mold line of a wing and its structural sizing. The solution of such design optimization problems is made possible by MACH, a framework for high-fidelity aerostructural optimization that uses state-of-the-art numerical methods. MACH combines a three-dimensional CFD solver, a finite-element structural model of the wingbox, a geometry modeler, and a gradient-based optimizer. It computes the flying shape of a wing and is able to optimize aircraft configurations with respect to hundreds of aerodynamic shape and internal structural sizes. The theoretical developments include coupled-adjoint sensitivity analysis, and an automatic differentiation adjoint approach. The algorithms resulting from these developments are all implemented to take advantage of massively parallel computers. To benchmark the developed approaches, we created a high-fidelity aeroelastic model based on NASA’s Common Research Model. In addition, we created a high aspect ratio wing version of this model to explore the use of new aircraft technologies. Applications to the optimization of aircraft configurations demonstrate the effectiveness of these approaches in designing aircraft wings for maximum performance.

Read the full paper here

Email
Print
LinkedIn
The paper above was part of  proceedings of a CEAS event and as such the author has signed a publication agreement to have their paper published in the repository. In the case this paper is found somewhere else CEAS always links to the other source.  CEAS takes great care in making the correct content available to the reader. If any mistakes are found  in the listings please contact us directly at papers@aerospacerepository.org and we will correct the listing promptly.  CEAS cannot be held liable either for mistakes in editorial or technical aspects, nor for omissions, nor for the correctness of the content. In particular, CEAS does not guarantee completeness or correctness of information contained in external websites which can be accessed via links from CEAS’s websites. Despite accurate research on the content of such linked external websites, CEAS cannot be held liable for their content. Only the content providers of such external sites are liable for their content. Should you notice any mistake in technical or editorial aspects of the CEAS site, please do not hesitate to inform us.