Antônio B. Guimarães Neto, Flávio J. Silvestre, Flávio L. C. Ribeiro, Flávio L. S. Bussamra, Roberto G. A. da Silva, Carlos E. S. Cesnik

DOI Number: N/A

Conference number: IFASD-2017-080

A simple and self-contained methodology to assess the validity of the assumption of small deformations in linear structural-dynamic models was recently proposed. The advantages of the methodology lie in the fact that it does not depend on the availability of higher-fidelity, nonlinear models: it is rather based on the selection of two different structural nodes where the structural motion is to be one at a time completely constrained, typically, a node near the center of mass and another in the region of maximum structural displacements with respect to mean axes. If the two displacement vectors calculated in each case can be transformed between themselves with linear rigid-body modes of the structure, then it is still in the regime of small deformations. In the present paper, in order to demonstrate the value of this methodology, it is applied to the X-HALE aircraft in its four-, sixand eight-meter-span configurations, and the results obtained with the assumption of small deformations are compared with a higher-fidelity model that comprises large structural deformations.

Read the full paper here

In Categories: 1.Events, Computational Aeroelasticity, IFASD 2017
Email
Print
LinkedIn
The paper above was part of  proceedings of a CEAS event and as such the author has signed a publication agreement to have their paper published in the repository. In the case this paper is found somewhere else CEAS always links to the other source.  CEAS takes great care in making the correct content available to the reader. If any mistakes are found  in the listings please contact us directly at papers@aerospacerepository.org and we will correct the listing promptly.  CEAS cannot be held liable either for mistakes in editorial or technical aspects, nor for omissions, nor for the correctness of the content. In particular, CEAS does not guarantee completeness or correctness of information contained in external websites which can be accessed via links from CEAS’s websites. Despite accurate research on the content of such linked external websites, CEAS cannot be held liable for their content. Only the content providers of such external sites are liable for their content. Should you notice any mistake in technical or editorial aspects of the CEAS site, please do not hesitate to inform us.