Nicholas N. Gibbons, Tristan Vanyai, Vincent Wheatley

DOI Number XXX-YYY-ZZZ

Conference Number HiSST-2022-115

A numerical study of compressible turbulent transition behind a multiport injector array (MPIA) is conducted. The flow domain corresponds to an axisymmetric inlet recently tested at The University of
Queensland that used an MPIA to trip the boundary layer, by injecting a small amount of nitrogen close
to the wall. A single row of four 0.2mm porthole injectors is simulated using Wall-Modelled Large Eddy
Simulation (LES), at an experimental condition corresponding to Mach 7.6 flight at a dynamic pressure
of 50kPa. The LES simulations reveal that the MPIA injection results in immediate large scale instabilities reminiscent of near-wall turbulence. The main feature of interest is a family of dominant frequencies
superimposed on the turbulent wavestructure, with a base wavelength of ≈ 5mm. The source of this
regularity appears to be periodic oscillation of the final fuel jet, which in turn is dynamically coupled to the
upstream jets in an complex and interesting manner which has not been described before. The turbulent
flow behind the MPIA results in an increase in wall heat transfer that counteracts any film cooling that
may be present from the injectors. The LES prediction of the heat transfer rates compare favourably to
experimental measurements, and RANS simulations using the Spalart-Allmaras and Menter SST models are found to underpredict wall heat transfer throughout the domain.

Read the full paper >

Email
Print
LinkedIn
The paper above was part of  proceedings of a CEAS event and as such the author has signed a publication agreement to have their paper published in the repository. In the case this paper is found somewhere else CEAS always links to the other source.  CEAS takes great care in making the correct content available to the reader. If any mistakes are found  in the listings please contact us directly at papers@aerospacerepository.org and we will correct the listing promptly.  CEAS cannot be held liable either for mistakes in editorial or technical aspects, nor for omissions, nor for the correctness of the content. In particular, CEAS does not guarantee completeness or correctness of information contained in external websites which can be accessed via links from CEAS’s websites. Despite accurate research on the content of such linked external websites, CEAS cannot be held liable for their content. Only the content providers of such external sites are liable for their content. Should you notice any mistake in technical or editorial aspects of the CEAS site, please do not hesitate to inform us.