{"id":18935,"date":"2025-02-14T11:39:25","date_gmt":"2025-02-14T11:39:25","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/aerospacerepository.org\/?p=18935"},"modified":"2025-02-14T11:39:26","modified_gmt":"2025-02-14T11:39:26","slug":"influence-on-the-flutter-behavior-of-pre-stressed-wing-structures-under-aerodynamic-loading","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/aerospacerepository.org\/index.php\/2025\/02\/14\/influence-on-the-flutter-behavior-of-pre-stressed-wing-structures-under-aerodynamic-loading\/","title":{"rendered":"INFLUENCE ON THE FLUTTER BEHAVIOR OF PRE-STRESSED WING STRUCTURES UNDER AERODYNAMIC LOADING"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p><strong>Andreas Hermanutz, Mirko Hornung<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>DOI Number: N\/A<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Conference number: IFASD-2019-082<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Modern wing designs exhibit a signi\ufb01cant increase in wing \ufb02exibility through slenderer wings in combination with an extensive lightweight structural design. Especially wing \ufb02utter becomes increasingly important with higher elasticity. In addition, wings with increased elasticity show a signi\ufb01cantly higher de\ufb02ection between jigand \ufb02ight-shape. For this purpose, the effects of changes in stiffness, mass matrix and different lift distributions between jig and 1g trimmed cruise condition are analyzed with regard to the \ufb02utter prediction according to the p-k method. The structural and aerodynamic effects are exemplary compared using a generic composite higher aspect ratio swept wing, where the most signi\ufb01cant in\ufb02uence could be identi\ufb01ed by the simple geometrical change from jigto \ufb02ight-shape.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/aerospacerepository.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/IFASD-2019-082.pdf\">Read the full paper here<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p><b>Andreas Hermanutz, Mirko Hornung<\/b><\/p>\n<p>DOI Number: N\/A<\/p>\n<p>Conference number: IFASD-2019-082<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[2440,2433],"tags":[1998,2920,2921],"class_list":["post-18935","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-computational-flutter","category-1-ifasd-2019","tag-computational-aeroelasticity","tag-utter-prediction","tag-high-aspect-ratio-exible-wing","category-2440","category-2433","description-off"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/aerospacerepository.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18935","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/aerospacerepository.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/aerospacerepository.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/aerospacerepository.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/aerospacerepository.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=18935"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/aerospacerepository.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18935\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":18937,"href":"https:\/\/aerospacerepository.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18935\/revisions\/18937"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/aerospacerepository.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=18935"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/aerospacerepository.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=18935"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/aerospacerepository.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=18935"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}