{"id":17844,"date":"2024-08-14T13:06:32","date_gmt":"2024-08-14T13:06:32","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/aerospacerepository.org\/?p=17844"},"modified":"2024-08-16T09:22:35","modified_gmt":"2024-08-16T09:22:35","slug":"transonic-aeroelasticity-using-the-2-5d-non-linearvortex-lattice-method","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/aerospacerepository.org\/index.php\/2024\/08\/14\/transonic-aeroelasticity-using-the-2-5d-non-linearvortex-lattice-method\/","title":{"rendered":"TRANSONIC AEROELASTICITY USING THE 2.5D NON-LINEAR VORTEX-LATTICE METHOD"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p><strong>A.Grozdanov, E.Laurendeau<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>DOI Number: N\/A<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Conference number: IFASD-2017-079<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Three-dimensional aeroelastic effects in the transonic \ufb02ight regime can be analyzed by combining high-\ufb01delity 3D CFD solutions with structural \ufb01nite element models containing a large number of degrees of freedom. This combination is computationally expensive and is impractical in the preliminary design phase. Here, a non-linear vortex-lattice method that couples 2.5D transonic CFD solutions is examined. As such, it provides adequate precision for the study of three-dimensional aeroelastic effects at the computational cost of a VLM solution. This paper presents the combination of this method with a \ufb01nite element beam model and demonstrates that this inexpensive method is suitable for the prediction of wing behavior in the transonic regime.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/aerospacerepository.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/IFASD-2017-079.pdf\">Read the full paper here<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p><b>A.Grozdanov, E.Laurendeau<b\/><\/p>\n<p>DOI Number: N\/A<\/p>\n<p>Conference number: IFASD-2017-079<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[993,1955,1953],"tags":[1972,2063,2103,2102,807,683],"class_list":["post-17844","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-events","category-aeroelasticity-in-conceptual-aircraft-design","category-ifasd-2017","tag-aeroelasticity","tag-computational-uid-dynamics","tag-crm","tag-hirenasd","tag-optimization","tag-transonic","category-993","category-1955","category-1953","description-off"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/aerospacerepository.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17844","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/aerospacerepository.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/aerospacerepository.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/aerospacerepository.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/aerospacerepository.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=17844"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/aerospacerepository.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17844\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":17928,"href":"https:\/\/aerospacerepository.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17844\/revisions\/17928"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/aerospacerepository.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=17844"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/aerospacerepository.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=17844"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/aerospacerepository.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=17844"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}