A. DE VITTORI; C. COLOMBO; M. OMODEI; J. LUIS GONZALO; M. MAESTRINI; P. DI LIZIA; P. G. PADRENY; M. TORRAS RIBELL; Á. GALLEGO TORREGO; D. ESCOBAR ANTÓN; R. ARMELLIN

DOI Number: 10.13009/EUCASS2023-061

In this paper an analytical and a semi-analytical technique to compute low thrust Collision Avoidance Manoeuvres (CAMs) are presented and tested against a large dataset of Conjunction Data Messages (CDMs). Such CDMs simulate real conjunctions and they are derived from a screening against a background Two-Line Element population in different orbit scenarios: early Geostationary transfer and insertion into GEO, GEO graveyard, Low Earth Orbit (LEO) to high-LEO transfer, and typical station keeping activities in LEO and GEO. A standard and an improved operational concept are simulated to manage the large uncertainty associated to the long-thrusting arcs present in the different orbit scenarios considered. On all these cases, the Close Approach (CA) is first analysed, in terms of miss distance, relative velocity and position on the b-plane, and the probability of collision at time of close approach. Then, the focus shifts to how CAM influences the displacement in the b-plane, expense for the manoeuvre and efficacy of it. For each of them, different Accepted Collision Probability Level (ACPL) thresholds and conjunction notification times are tested for CAM design. We analyse the convergence of the proposed methods and the capabilities to achieve the required ACPL for a given operational scenano.

Read the full paper here

Email
Print
LinkedIn
The paper above was part of  proceedings of a CEAS event and as such the author has signed a publication agreement to have their paper published in the repository. In the case this paper is found somewhere else CEAS always links to the other source.  CEAS takes great care in making the correct content available to the reader. If any mistakes are found  in the listings please contact us directly at papers@aerospacerepository.org and we will correct the listing promptly.  CEAS cannot be held liable either for mistakes in editorial or technical aspects, nor for omissions, nor for the correctness of the content. In particular, CEAS does not guarantee completeness or correctness of information contained in external websites which can be accessed via links from CEAS’s websites. Despite accurate research on the content of such linked external websites, CEAS cannot be held liable for their content. Only the content providers of such external sites are liable for their content. Should you notice any mistake in technical or editorial aspects of the CEAS site, please do not hesitate to inform us.