CARLO E.D. RIBOLDI; ALBERTO ROLANDO

DOI Number: 10.13009/EUCASS2023-025

The problem of three-axis stabilization and beam-tracking guidance of a thrust-controlled airship without thrust vectoring is analyzed. A comparison is carried out throughout the work, introducing at first stability­augmentation and guidance controllers for an existing reference airship, featuring traditional aerodynamic surfaces for control. Then a four-thrusters airship with no aerodynamic controls is presented, and flight controllers for this platform are designed and implemented. The performance of both airships in au­tonomous flight is assessed in a realistic non-linear dynamics simulator, showing interesting tradeoffs of the two configurations in complex virtual scenarios, in still air or steady wind conditions.

Read the full paper here

Email
Print
LinkedIn
The paper above was part of  proceedings of a CEAS event and as such the author has signed a publication agreement to have their paper published in the repository. In the case this paper is found somewhere else CEAS always links to the other source.  CEAS takes great care in making the correct content available to the reader. If any mistakes are found  in the listings please contact us directly at papers@aerospacerepository.org and we will correct the listing promptly.  CEAS cannot be held liable either for mistakes in editorial or technical aspects, nor for omissions, nor for the correctness of the content. In particular, CEAS does not guarantee completeness or correctness of information contained in external websites which can be accessed via links from CEAS’s websites. Despite accurate research on the content of such linked external websites, CEAS cannot be held liable for their content. Only the content providers of such external sites are liable for their content. Should you notice any mistake in technical or editorial aspects of the CEAS site, please do not hesitate to inform us.