IVENS DANIEL HOFFMANN; DMITRY SUSLOV; JAN DEEKEN; JUSTIN HARDI

DOI Number: 10.13009/EUCASS2023-032

The performance and stability of liquid rocket engines heavily rely on the behavior of the injector. Achiev­ing an effective chemical reaction and highly efficient homogeneous fuel mixture within a minimal cham­ber length is a major challenge. This requirement extends to various modem combustion systems such as chemical industrial plants, heating systems, and engines, placing extreme demands on injection equipment. This article presents a concept for a Swirler injector for the oxidizer that utilizes helical swirlers with different angles, lengths, and positions within the injector. The design of this system draws on the DLR Lampoldshausen’s expertise in porous injection technologies, with potential future applications in the DLR LUMEN Technology Demonstrator. To evaluate the performance of the system, tests were conducted at the Water Test Laboratory at DLR Lampoldshausen using water as a simulation of liquid oxygen (LOX) behavior at various pressures (rang­ing from Oto 20 bar). High-speed cameras (Chronos CR21-l.0-16C) were employed for shadowgraphy imaging to visualize the spray angle at the injector post orifice and study atomization. Pressure mea­surements were taken using static pressure sensors at the LOX-Dome and directly before the swirler to assess the influence of pressure loss caused by the swirler in relation to the raw surface condition of the 3D-printed injector. The helical swirlers were differentiated based on the swirler angle (15, 30, and 45 degrees), swirler length (full tum/ 360 degrees or half tum/ 180 degrees), and swirler position (entry, middle, and exit) within the injector.

Read the full paper here

Email
Print
LinkedIn
The paper above was part of  proceedings of a CEAS event and as such the author has signed a publication agreement to have their paper published in the repository. In the case this paper is found somewhere else CEAS always links to the other source.  CEAS takes great care in making the correct content available to the reader. If any mistakes are found  in the listings please contact us directly at papers@aerospacerepository.org and we will correct the listing promptly.  CEAS cannot be held liable either for mistakes in editorial or technical aspects, nor for omissions, nor for the correctness of the content. In particular, CEAS does not guarantee completeness or correctness of information contained in external websites which can be accessed via links from CEAS’s websites. Despite accurate research on the content of such linked external websites, CEAS cannot be held liable for their content. Only the content providers of such external sites are liable for their content. Should you notice any mistake in technical or editorial aspects of the CEAS site, please do not hesitate to inform us.