IVENS DANIEL HOFFMANN; JAN MARTIN; WOLFGANG ARMBRUSTER; DMITRY SUSLOV; JAN DEEKEN; JUSTIN HARDI

DOI Number: 10.13009/EUCASS2023-031

For the performance and stability of liquid propellant rocket engines, injector behavior is of utmost impor­tance. A major problem is achieving an effective chemical reaction and a highly efficient homogeneous mixture of fuels with a minimum chamber length. These processes are also crucial in many other mod­ern combustion systems such as chemical industrial plants, heating systems, and engines, which lead to extremely high requirements for the injection equipment. This article presents a concept for an injection system based on the application of different porous materials and oxidizer injectors. The system has been designed based on DLR Lampoldshausen’s heritage within porous injection technologies and its possible future use at the DLR LUMEN Technology Demonstrator. The setup has been successfully implemented and operated under sub-to-supercritical pressure conditions (tested from 35 to 65 bar), with respect to the critical pressure of oxygen, using the penta-injector research combustor. Optical investigations of the near­injector combustion and flow field behavior for different penta-injector elements were conducted. Fuel was injected through a metallic mesh (Rigimesh®) or sinter bronze (CA-100). As for the oxygen injector, three different variations were tested: a conventional axial injector, a pentagon pattern riffling injector, and a helical swirl injector. The latter two were manufactured using Additive Layering Manufacturing (ALM).

Read the full paper here

Email
Print
LinkedIn
The paper above was part of  proceedings of a CEAS event and as such the author has signed a publication agreement to have their paper published in the repository. In the case this paper is found somewhere else CEAS always links to the other source.  CEAS takes great care in making the correct content available to the reader. If any mistakes are found  in the listings please contact us directly at papers@aerospacerepository.org and we will correct the listing promptly.  CEAS cannot be held liable either for mistakes in editorial or technical aspects, nor for omissions, nor for the correctness of the content. In particular, CEAS does not guarantee completeness or correctness of information contained in external websites which can be accessed via links from CEAS’s websites. Despite accurate research on the content of such linked external websites, CEAS cannot be held liable for their content. Only the content providers of such external sites are liable for their content. Should you notice any mistake in technical or editorial aspects of the CEAS site, please do not hesitate to inform us.