Mika EDAHIRO, Akiko MATSUO, Tatsushi ISONO, Masahiro TAKAHASHI, Sadatake TOMIOKA

DOI Number: N/A

Conference number: HiSST-2025-009

Turbine-based combined cycle (TBCC) engine represents one of the most promising propulsion technologies capable of sustained hypersonic flight. To achieve optimal thrust generation across the entire flight envelope, it is crucial to optimize the TBCC nozzle geometry, which directly governs both thrust and lift generation. This study examined the influence of direct turbo-ramjet to scramjet flow path integration on the scramjet’s propulsive performance at cruising speeds, specifically in the absence of any variable mechanisms such as sliding plates or variable splitter to regulate the flow distribution between the two passages. The computational domain was based on the Single Expansion ramp nozzle (SERN) configuration, employing a scramjet’s nozzle inlet height of 163 mm and a length of 3058 mm, while investigating four cases involving cowl to turbo-ramjet flow path distances ranging from 220 mm to 820 mm. The inflow into the nozzle originates exclusively from the scramjet inlet, characterized by a Mach number 1.97, the static pressure of 103.7 kPa, and a static temperature of 2518 K. The two-dimensional compressible Navier-Stokes equation was adopted as the governing equation for the numerical analysis. The result revealed a thrust reduction of 2.3 % for the 820 mm configuration, the case corresponding to the most downstream integration point with the turbo-ramjet flow path, when
compared with the baseline SERN configuration.

Read the full paper here

Email
Print
LinkedIn
The paper above was part of  proceedings of a CEAS event and as such the author has signed a publication agreement to have their paper published in the repository. In the case this paper is found somewhere else CEAS always links to the other source.  CEAS takes great care in making the correct content available to the reader. If any mistakes are found  in the listings please contact us directly at papers@aerospacerepository.org and we will correct the listing promptly.  CEAS cannot be held liable either for mistakes in editorial or technical aspects, nor for omissions, nor for the correctness of the content. In particular, CEAS does not guarantee completeness or correctness of information contained in external websites which can be accessed via links from CEAS’s websites. Despite accurate research on the content of such linked external websites, CEAS cannot be held liable for their content. Only the content providers of such external sites are liable for their content. Should you notice any mistake in technical or editorial aspects of the CEAS site, please do not hesitate to inform us.