Chiara AMATO, Tim HORCHLER, Divek SURUJHLAL, Tobias ECKER, Giannino PONCHIO CAMILLO

DOI Number: N/A

Conference number: HiSST-2025-017

This study investigates radiative heat flux contributions in high-enthalpy shock tunnel experiments through a combined experimental and numerical approach. Experiments were conducted in the High Enthalpy Shock Tunnel Göttingen (HEG) using a flat-faced cylinder equipped with heat flux and radiation sensors, while Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) simulations were performed with the DLR TAU solver and the next-generation HyperCODA code. Radiation modeling employed both infinite-slab and photon Monte Carlo methods in conjunction with the PARADE database to quantify contributions from shock-layer emission and hot-gas radiation near the nozzle throat. The results indicate that shock-induced radiation accounts for approximately 2% of the convective heat flux at the stagnation point, whereas nozzle-throat contributions are strongly reduced by wall absorption effects
and remain of secondary importance. Additional modeling of iron particle radiation suggests that suspended contaminants may dominate radiative heating, potentially explaining the long-observed heat flux anomalies in high-enthalpy facilities. The work confirms the consistency of HyperCODA with TAU for high-enthalpy conditions and highlights the need for further diagnostics of particulate contamination in shock tunnels.

Read the full paper here

Email
Print
LinkedIn
The paper above was part of  proceedings of a CEAS event and as such the author has signed a publication agreement to have their paper published in the repository. In the case this paper is found somewhere else CEAS always links to the other source.  CEAS takes great care in making the correct content available to the reader. If any mistakes are found  in the listings please contact us directly at papers@aerospacerepository.org and we will correct the listing promptly.  CEAS cannot be held liable either for mistakes in editorial or technical aspects, nor for omissions, nor for the correctness of the content. In particular, CEAS does not guarantee completeness or correctness of information contained in external websites which can be accessed via links from CEAS’s websites. Despite accurate research on the content of such linked external websites, CEAS cannot be held liable for their content. Only the content providers of such external sites are liable for their content. Should you notice any mistake in technical or editorial aspects of the CEAS site, please do not hesitate to inform us.