Pedro Paulo Batista De ARAUJO, Yan Da Silva PEDRONI, João Vitor Marques Brito De SIQUEIRA, Fábio Henrique Eugênio RIBEIRO, Angelo PASSARO, Amanda CHENU ROMANO, Leda Marise VIALTA

DOI Number: N/A

Conference number: HiSST-2025-014

This study presents a comparison between a low-cost supersonic combustion modeling approach and CFD simulations validated against experimental data obtained from shock tunnel testing. The CFD analysis employs a finite-rate chemistry model without turbulence-chemistry interaction (no TCI), using the SST k–ω turbulence model in a Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes equation (RANS) approach. Three combustor geometries, with and without flame holder, were evaluated. Parameters of combustion efficiency were derived from CFD simulations. Pressure, temperature, and Mach number were compared to assess the accuracy of the proposed low-cost methodology.

Read the full paper here

Email
Print
LinkedIn
The paper above was part of  proceedings of a CEAS event and as such the author has signed a publication agreement to have their paper published in the repository. In the case this paper is found somewhere else CEAS always links to the other source.  CEAS takes great care in making the correct content available to the reader. If any mistakes are found  in the listings please contact us directly at papers@aerospacerepository.org and we will correct the listing promptly.  CEAS cannot be held liable either for mistakes in editorial or technical aspects, nor for omissions, nor for the correctness of the content. In particular, CEAS does not guarantee completeness or correctness of information contained in external websites which can be accessed via links from CEAS’s websites. Despite accurate research on the content of such linked external websites, CEAS cannot be held liable for their content. Only the content providers of such external sites are liable for their content. Should you notice any mistake in technical or editorial aspects of the CEAS site, please do not hesitate to inform us.