Vivien LORIDAN, Gabriel PRIGENT, Fabien CHOPIN, Simon PELUCHON

DOI Number: N/A

Conference number: HiSST-2025-015

In the context of atmospheric entry, a numerical platform that couples a computational fluid dynamics module and a material thermal response solver has been developed over the last decades and has been enriched over time with different ablation strategies, such as the historical ablation model that relies on B’ tabulation, or more recently the nonequilibrium multi-species ablation approach. The purpose of this work is to focus on a third strategy: the multi-element ablation model. It aims at taking the advantages from both the aforementionned frameworks, as it is shown to be more predictive than the usual B’ tabulations and to be more computationally competitive than the exhaustive multi-species
ablation paradigm. For this new formulation, the Navier-Stokes equations have been rewritten in terms of chemical elements, allowing to deal with a reduced number of chemical entities (i.e. only the atomic components of the chemical species) and thus shrinking the size of the whole Navier-Stokes system to solve. Under the assumption of chemical equilibrium, the proportions of chemical species that govern the flow properties are retrieved at each iterative step by using the equilibrium solver of the open-source
Mutation++ library. Computing efficiency has additionally be gained by replacing the successive calls to Mutation++ with a neural network that has been trained to emulate its behavior. As a validating framework, 2D axisymmetric simulations are carried out on three different configurations. The first two rely on the arc-jet tests conducted respectively in the VKI’s Plasmatron facility and in the Interactive Heating Facility at NASA Ames Research Center, and the third one is related to the atmospheric entry of the IRV-2 vehicle. The multi-element approach using the solver from Mutation++ is shown to be reliable and efficient compared with its multi-species counterpart. With the use of the neural network,
the results remain accurate with a gain in computational time up to a factor of 4.

Read the full paper here

Email
Print
LinkedIn
The paper above was part of  proceedings of a CEAS event and as such the author has signed a publication agreement to have their paper published in the repository. In the case this paper is found somewhere else CEAS always links to the other source.  CEAS takes great care in making the correct content available to the reader. If any mistakes are found  in the listings please contact us directly at papers@aerospacerepository.org and we will correct the listing promptly.  CEAS cannot be held liable either for mistakes in editorial or technical aspects, nor for omissions, nor for the correctness of the content. In particular, CEAS does not guarantee completeness or correctness of information contained in external websites which can be accessed via links from CEAS’s websites. Despite accurate research on the content of such linked external websites, CEAS cannot be held liable for their content. Only the content providers of such external sites are liable for their content. Should you notice any mistake in technical or editorial aspects of the CEAS site, please do not hesitate to inform us.