Moritz ERTL, Leo BASVOV

DOI Number: N/A

Conference number: HiSST-2025-103

This work verifies a recently introduced approach to model chemical reactions as implemented in our kinetic Fokker-Planck (FP) code for an industrial scale space transport problem. The FP method is used as it is able to simulate flows in the rarefied regime above the continuum limit, as found at high altitudes. The FP method provides this physical modelling advantage of a particle method with the computational efficiency needed for the simulations of industrial scale applications. We compare FP simulations of the generic RFZ-ST2 upper stage to computational fluid dynamics (CFD) Navier-Stokes simulations with the DLR TAU code. An artificial flight Mach number of Ma = 15 is set to facilitate chemical reactions. We limit ourselves to dissociation and exchange reactions. We compare the flow fields and the surface distributions to validate the implementation. This is done as a step towards the simulation of re-usable launch vehicles at high altitudes in re-entry and re-entry burn situations.

Read the full paper here

Email
Print
LinkedIn
The paper above was part of  proceedings of a CEAS event and as such the author has signed a publication agreement to have their paper published in the repository. In the case this paper is found somewhere else CEAS always links to the other source.  CEAS takes great care in making the correct content available to the reader. If any mistakes are found  in the listings please contact us directly at papers@aerospacerepository.org and we will correct the listing promptly.  CEAS cannot be held liable either for mistakes in editorial or technical aspects, nor for omissions, nor for the correctness of the content. In particular, CEAS does not guarantee completeness or correctness of information contained in external websites which can be accessed via links from CEAS’s websites. Despite accurate research on the content of such linked external websites, CEAS cannot be held liable for their content. Only the content providers of such external sites are liable for their content. Should you notice any mistake in technical or editorial aspects of the CEAS site, please do not hesitate to inform us.