Zheng LI, Huacheng YUAN

DOI Number: N/A

Conference number: HiSST-2025-128

The integrated configuration design of hypersonic Bump inlet requires consideration of both aerodynamic constraints generated by the aircraft forebody and strong geometric constraints within the limited space of the vehicle, while simultaneously addressing inlet flowfield shock wave system organization and aerodynamic performance. The Bump inlet design method proposed in this paper divides the integrated configuration into two parts: the Bump surface profile determined based on the forebody wave system and the internal flowpath profile based on geometric fusion. Example configuration design was conducted and validated through wind tunnel test, with design point schlieren images showing that the aircraft forebody shock wave and Bump shock wave intersect at the lip, achieving excellent integration effects. Numerical simulation further analyzed the topological structure
of the main separation regions and the background shock wave systems structure within the internal flowpath. The background wave system in the internal flowpath is primarily generated by the reflection of two families of shock waves induced by lip-reflected shocks and shoulder separation-induced shocks. By controlling the lip compression angle, the number of background shock waves in the internal flowpath was effectively reduced, resulting in a 12.35% increase in total pressure recovery coefficient at the isolator outlet and a 2.82% increase in outlet Mach number.

Read the full paper here

Email
Print
LinkedIn
The paper above was part of  proceedings of a CEAS event and as such the author has signed a publication agreement to have their paper published in the repository. In the case this paper is found somewhere else CEAS always links to the other source.  CEAS takes great care in making the correct content available to the reader. If any mistakes are found  in the listings please contact us directly at papers@aerospacerepository.org and we will correct the listing promptly.  CEAS cannot be held liable either for mistakes in editorial or technical aspects, nor for omissions, nor for the correctness of the content. In particular, CEAS does not guarantee completeness or correctness of information contained in external websites which can be accessed via links from CEAS’s websites. Despite accurate research on the content of such linked external websites, CEAS cannot be held liable for their content. Only the content providers of such external sites are liable for their content. Should you notice any mistake in technical or editorial aspects of the CEAS site, please do not hesitate to inform us.