David CERANTOLA, Pradeep DASS

DOI Number: N/A

Conference number: HiSST-2025-198

Designing spacecraft for missions with wide velocity ranges is a challenging task given the monumental performance variations between subsonic and hypersonic. A trajectory analysis is a beneficial exercise early in the design process to help identify the critical operating conditions needed for component design. Existing publicly available trajectory evaluation tools do not have the functionality to trim the aircraft, quantify static margin, or have the necessary degrees of freedom to satisfy the performance needs. With few exceptions, the emphasis of existing trajectory analyses is on optimized solutions; however, developing a satisfactory performance coefficient data-set for a multi-phase cruise vehicle to yield feasible solutions is not obvious. This paper evaluates a trajectory for a turbo-ramjet spacecraft from a horizontal take-off to a Mach 5 at 30 km altitude mission objective and descent to a horizontal landing where the initial performance dataset is insufficient to find a solution. Trajectories were evaluated using the Dymos library built onto OpenMDAO where input lift, drag, and moment coefficients were obtained from CFD and thrust and fuel consumption coefficients from pyCycle. The methodology section introduces a trimming module and solver strategy that leverages specific excess power to advise an initial guess. The obtained trajectory with a minimize time objective shows the trimmed vehicle travelled 672 km in 872s, had longitudinal static stability, and required 11.6% of take-off mass to be fuel. A 20% thrust enhancement factor applied to the ramjet phase was necessary to achieve 30km altitude whereas 28km altitude was achieved without enhancement.

Read the full paper here

Email
Print
LinkedIn
The paper above was part of  proceedings of a CEAS event and as such the author has signed a publication agreement to have their paper published in the repository. In the case this paper is found somewhere else CEAS always links to the other source.  CEAS takes great care in making the correct content available to the reader. If any mistakes are found  in the listings please contact us directly at papers@aerospacerepository.org and we will correct the listing promptly.  CEAS cannot be held liable either for mistakes in editorial or technical aspects, nor for omissions, nor for the correctness of the content. In particular, CEAS does not guarantee completeness or correctness of information contained in external websites which can be accessed via links from CEAS’s websites. Despite accurate research on the content of such linked external websites, CEAS cannot be held liable for their content. Only the content providers of such external sites are liable for their content. Should you notice any mistake in technical or editorial aspects of the CEAS site, please do not hesitate to inform us.