Hugo AZEMA, Alexandre BAS, Antoine ABAUZIT, Antoine BRISSAUD

DOI Number: N/A

Conference number: HiSST-2025-286

Hypersonic vehicles usually use initial boost systems leading to a high speed and dynamic pressure separation phase. Accurately replicating this separation phase through ground testing is very complex due to the significant mechanical and aerodynamic constraints. To minimize the number of real scale flight tests required to develop the separation solution, numerical simulations become essential. Using the work of Tartabini (2011) [1], MBDA France developed a numerical simulation tool called SPLITS (Simulation Physique de Largage InTer Solides) able to compute the trajectories of an arbitrary number of mechanically linked objects. By combining a precise and dense mesh of CFD computations and analytical solving of the stress at mechanical joints using CFE methodology, it enables precise evaluation of all solids’ relative kinematics during the separation phase. SPLITS was designed to be highly modular, with joints between solids potentially evolving during the simulation, reflecting loss of contact or breaking of an element. Moreover, the tool can monitor forces and moments at contact joints, helping engineers design a robust concept. From a more industrial point of view, modular-use in different projects is simplified with an unchanged simulation core. Only aerodynamics models and liaisons graph are to be updated using standard interfaces. Once the design has converged, SPLITS can also be used in ground test, reducing or deleting the aerodynamic wrench and adding elements to match the test configuration. The ground tests results can then be compared to dedicated numerical simulations, which helps validate and adjust the models before flight tests. Finally, in-flight measurements can be used to correct any remaining discrepancies between simulation and reality.

Read the full paper here

Email
Print
LinkedIn
The paper above was part of  proceedings of a CEAS event and as such the author has signed a publication agreement to have their paper published in the repository. In the case this paper is found somewhere else CEAS always links to the other source.  CEAS takes great care in making the correct content available to the reader. If any mistakes are found  in the listings please contact us directly at papers@aerospacerepository.org and we will correct the listing promptly.  CEAS cannot be held liable either for mistakes in editorial or technical aspects, nor for omissions, nor for the correctness of the content. In particular, CEAS does not guarantee completeness or correctness of information contained in external websites which can be accessed via links from CEAS’s websites. Despite accurate research on the content of such linked external websites, CEAS cannot be held liable for their content. Only the content providers of such external sites are liable for their content. Should you notice any mistake in technical or editorial aspects of the CEAS site, please do not hesitate to inform us.