Loïc SOMBAERT, Mathieu LUGRIN, Sébastien ESQUIEU, Reynald BUR

DOI Number: N/A

Conference number: HiSST-2025-256

This support paper for the oral presentation at the HiSST conference investigates the laminar-to-turbulent transition over the BOLT geometry, based on experimental data acquired in the ONERA R2Ch hypersonic blowdown wind tunnel using a 1/3-subscale model at Mach 7. Infrared thermography and high-speed wall-pressure measurements (PCB sensors) were obtained across a broad range of freestream Reynolds numbers, from fully laminar to well-developed turbulent regimes. Transition typically appears firstly in the outboard region of the geometry, characterized by the appearance of two symmetric heating lobes away from the centerline. Particular attention is given to this region, where a high-frequency instability near 150 kHz is consistently detected in the Power Spectral Densities at Reynolds numbers around 5×106 m-1. A lower-frequency bump near 20 kHz is also observed, though less distinctly. To investigate the physical origin and nature of these instabilities, a Linear Stability Theory (LST) analysis is conducted based on numerically computed laminar baseflows. Results from this analysis suggest that the observed spectral bumps are associated with the amplification of the second Mack mode and traveling crossflow instabilities. This is consistent with existing literature, as these two instability mechanisms are commonly identified as dominant in hypersonic boundary-layer transition over complex three-dimensional geometries. However, the application of classical LST to such a complex three-dimensional geometry leads to relatively low N-factors, below 1.5, despite the experimental data clearly indicating the occurrence of transition. This discrepancy highlights the limitations of LST in predicting transition onset in realistic configurations,
where non-parallel effects and mode interactions may play a significant role and are not captured by local, linear analyses.

Read the full paper here

Email
Print
LinkedIn
The paper above was part of  proceedings of a CEAS event and as such the author has signed a publication agreement to have their paper published in the repository. In the case this paper is found somewhere else CEAS always links to the other source.  CEAS takes great care in making the correct content available to the reader. If any mistakes are found  in the listings please contact us directly at papers@aerospacerepository.org and we will correct the listing promptly.  CEAS cannot be held liable either for mistakes in editorial or technical aspects, nor for omissions, nor for the correctness of the content. In particular, CEAS does not guarantee completeness or correctness of information contained in external websites which can be accessed via links from CEAS’s websites. Despite accurate research on the content of such linked external websites, CEAS cannot be held liable for their content. Only the content providers of such external sites are liable for their content. Should you notice any mistake in technical or editorial aspects of the CEAS site, please do not hesitate to inform us.