Yu-Tang HUANG, Yao-Chen KANG, Zhong-Xuan HE, Tony YUAN, Szu-I YEH

DOI Number: N/A

Conference number: HiSST-2025-214

This study experimentally investigates fuel injection, atomization, mixing, and flameholding mechanisms in a supersonic cavity combustor, focusing on the influence of fuel mass flow rate on flame stability. Cold-flow and hot-ignition experiments were conducted with integrated flow visualization and pressure measurements to examine the relationship between cavity flow structures and combustion behaviour. In the cold-flow experiments, schlieren imaging revealed that at a mass flow rate of 3 g/s, the injected fuel is effectively entrained into the recirculation zone, achieving sufficient mixing, whereas at 4.5 g/s and 6 g/s, significant fuel retention within the shear layer reduces atomization efficiency and
results in locally fuel-rich conditions. Under hot-ignition conditions, stable flameholding was observed at 3 g/s, while higher flow rates led to fuel accumulation and unstable combustion. These findings demonstrate the strong correlation between fuel mass flow rate, atomization efficiency, shear-layer dynamics, and flameholding stability, offering experimental insights into flame stabilization mechanisms for future supersonic combustor design.

Read the full paper here

Email
Print
LinkedIn
The paper above was part of  proceedings of a CEAS event and as such the author has signed a publication agreement to have their paper published in the repository. In the case this paper is found somewhere else CEAS always links to the other source.  CEAS takes great care in making the correct content available to the reader. If any mistakes are found  in the listings please contact us directly at papers@aerospacerepository.org and we will correct the listing promptly.  CEAS cannot be held liable either for mistakes in editorial or technical aspects, nor for omissions, nor for the correctness of the content. In particular, CEAS does not guarantee completeness or correctness of information contained in external websites which can be accessed via links from CEAS’s websites. Despite accurate research on the content of such linked external websites, CEAS cannot be held liable for their content. Only the content providers of such external sites are liable for their content. Should you notice any mistake in technical or editorial aspects of the CEAS site, please do not hesitate to inform us.