Christopher Koch

DOI Number: N/A

Conference number: IFASD-2024-018

Whirl flutter as an aeroelastic instability can occur for aircraft configurations with propellers mounted on an elastic support. It has to be mitigated in the design process, and its
prediction needs to be included in the frequency-domain flutter analysis process of such aircraft. But, as these processes often rely on the classical method developed by Houbolt and Reed and revolve around linear aerodynamic derivatives for the propeller, they are not always compatible with advanced frequency-domain representations of the propeller such as the Transfer-Matrix method. This paper provides a linearization procedure to derive propeller aerodynamic derivatives similar to those from the classical method from frequency-dependent transfer matrices. These linearized derivatives are compatible with legacy workflows and allow an increase in the fidelity of propeller aerodynamics in existing frequency-domain flutter workflows. This paper also compares the impact of different propeller aerodynamic modeling on the whirl flutter stability of a generic, twin-engine turboprop aircraft. Results show the linearized workflow’s effectiveness and indicate a stabilizing effect when including more modeling features like unsteady aerodynamics and local induced velocities.

Read the full paper here

Email
Print
LinkedIn
The paper above was part of  proceedings of a CEAS event and as such the author has signed a publication agreement to have their paper published in the repository. In the case this paper is found somewhere else CEAS always links to the other source.  CEAS takes great care in making the correct content available to the reader. If any mistakes are found  in the listings please contact us directly at papers@aerospacerepository.org and we will correct the listing promptly.  CEAS cannot be held liable either for mistakes in editorial or technical aspects, nor for omissions, nor for the correctness of the content. In particular, CEAS does not guarantee completeness or correctness of information contained in external websites which can be accessed via links from CEAS’s websites. Despite accurate research on the content of such linked external websites, CEAS cannot be held liable for their content. Only the content providers of such external sites are liable for their content. Should you notice any mistake in technical or editorial aspects of the CEAS site, please do not hesitate to inform us.