Arne Voss

DOI Number: N/A

Conference number: IFASD-2024-001

The gust encounter of a supersonic fighter aircraft is investigated with the CFD code SU2 and the aerodynamic panel methods VLM and ZONA51. The interaction of the
elastic aircraft, the flight controller and the gust is captured in a closed-loop time domain simulation. The comparisons show a moderate agreement between aerodynamic panel
methods and CFD in terms of section loads, which has multiple reasons: first, the two aerodynamic methods yield different pitching moment characteristics, which have an
influence on the flight mechanical reaction of the aircraft and the reaction of the flight controller. Second, due to the increase of the effective angle of attack during the gust
encounter, vortices develop, which are not present in the horizontal level flight condition. Because of the large suction peaks due to the vortices, the surface pressure distribution
changes significantly, an effect that is missed completely by the aerodynamic panel methods. The section loads predicted by the CFD based approach are higher, which eventually
influences the structural sizing of the aircraft. Also, there is a significant structural dynamic reaction, which shows that for fighter aircraft, a transient gust analysis including structural elasticity is essential for the aircraft design.

Read the full paper here

Email
Print
LinkedIn
The paper above was part of  proceedings of a CEAS event and as such the author has signed a publication agreement to have their paper published in the repository. In the case this paper is found somewhere else CEAS always links to the other source.  CEAS takes great care in making the correct content available to the reader. If any mistakes are found  in the listings please contact us directly at papers@aerospacerepository.org and we will correct the listing promptly.  CEAS cannot be held liable either for mistakes in editorial or technical aspects, nor for omissions, nor for the correctness of the content. In particular, CEAS does not guarantee completeness or correctness of information contained in external websites which can be accessed via links from CEAS’s websites. Despite accurate research on the content of such linked external websites, CEAS cannot be held liable for their content. Only the content providers of such external sites are liable for their content. Should you notice any mistake in technical or editorial aspects of the CEAS site, please do not hesitate to inform us.