Chen Zhu, Ying Bi, Zijian Zhu, Zhuolin Ying, Xiaoping Ma

DOI Number: N/A

Conference number: IFASD-2024-037

For the unmanned multi-body aircraft (MBA), free plays are commonly found at the flexible hinges between adjacent flight units, and its nonlinear characteristics will result in the
deviation of aircraft aeroelastic stability boundary, so it is necessary to carry out the research that takes into account the free-play nonlinearity in the context of aeroelastic response analysis. The research focuses on the free play in the rotation direction at the wingtip of an unmanned multi-body aircraft. Based on the fictitious mass method, an appropriate fictitious mass is selected at a suitable position, and the modal shape is linearized to establish a unified modal array capable of expressing deformations across the entire response spectrum. Besides, rational function fitting is used to convert the unsteady aerodynamic forces in the frequency domain to the time domain, and the limit cycle response characteristics corresponding to different free-play parameters are analyzed. The results show that when there is a free play between the wings of an unmanned
multi-body aircraft, nonlinear limit cycle oscillations occur within a specific region below the linear flutter threshold, and the parameters defining these free plays have a notable impact on the amplitude of these limit cycle oscillations and the speed at which divergence occurs.

Read the full paper here

Email
Print
LinkedIn
The paper above was part of  proceedings of a CEAS event and as such the author has signed a publication agreement to have their paper published in the repository. In the case this paper is found somewhere else CEAS always links to the other source.  CEAS takes great care in making the correct content available to the reader. If any mistakes are found  in the listings please contact us directly at papers@aerospacerepository.org and we will correct the listing promptly.  CEAS cannot be held liable either for mistakes in editorial or technical aspects, nor for omissions, nor for the correctness of the content. In particular, CEAS does not guarantee completeness or correctness of information contained in external websites which can be accessed via links from CEAS’s websites. Despite accurate research on the content of such linked external websites, CEAS cannot be held liable for their content. Only the content providers of such external sites are liable for their content. Should you notice any mistake in technical or editorial aspects of the CEAS site, please do not hesitate to inform us.