Stefan de Boer, Jurij Sodja, Roeland De Breuker

DOI Number: N/A

Conference number: IFASD-2024-057

In line with recent advancements in aviation, which lead to more fuel-efficient aircraft, this paper presents a novel continuous movable parameterisation methodology. The
methodology takes advantage of the ability of the doublet lattice method (DLM) to describe aerodynamic forces using downwash. The movables are described in the continuous space using a downwash distribution generated using a B-spline surface. To demonstrate and assess the movable modelling methodology, the U-HARWARD aircraft model has been used, with the performance of the continuous parameterisation compared to a reference movable parameterisation for roll control, manoeuvre load alleviation and cruise performance. The results show that the continuous parameterisation can determine a downwash distribution that is at least equal in performance – during roll – or has better performance – for manoeuvre load alleviation and cruise performance – than the reference parameterisation. The continuous parameterisation showed a 3 percentage points improvement with respect to the reference parameterisation for manoeuvre load alleviation and a 2.4 percentage points improvement for the induced drag coefficient.
The results in the paper demonstrated the successful application of a movable parameterisation methodology, which can be applied to an aircraft for which only the planform and initial structural parameters are known.

Read the full paper here

Email
Print
LinkedIn
The paper above was part of  proceedings of a CEAS event and as such the author has signed a publication agreement to have their paper published in the repository. In the case this paper is found somewhere else CEAS always links to the other source.  CEAS takes great care in making the correct content available to the reader. If any mistakes are found  in the listings please contact us directly at papers@aerospacerepository.org and we will correct the listing promptly.  CEAS cannot be held liable either for mistakes in editorial or technical aspects, nor for omissions, nor for the correctness of the content. In particular, CEAS does not guarantee completeness or correctness of information contained in external websites which can be accessed via links from CEAS’s websites. Despite accurate research on the content of such linked external websites, CEAS cannot be held liable for their content. Only the content providers of such external sites are liable for their content. Should you notice any mistake in technical or editorial aspects of the CEAS site, please do not hesitate to inform us.