Cedric Liauzun, Christophe Blondeau

DOI Number: N/A

Conference number: IFASD-2024-034

Several typical aeroelastic phenomena and instabilities, like flutter, induce periodic oscillations of the structure and of the aerodynamic forces. Numerical methods based on
the harmonic balance technique or the Time Spectral Method (TSM) with a projection on the Fourier space has proven to be very efficient to predict the oscillatory phenomena by resolving the established regime without solving for the transient one. Such formulations lead however to critical numerical difficulties especially with a fine time sampling. A modular parallel TSM solver is implemented in a high level abstraction Python layer in order to perform aeroelastic analyses and optimizations of wings. This solver is in charge of performing all the operations regarding the temporal discretization and the time resolution. An interface with the CFD code elsA extracts all the needed information related to the spatial discretization. An Approximate Newton algorithm is used to solve the TSM problem. Both a Block-Jacobi method and a pre-conditioned GMRES are implemented to solve the implicit linear system. Such a modular approach makes the evaluation of resolution algorithms easier to improve the computational robustness and efficiency. A ”block-circulant” preconditioner is thus assessed for its capability to provide convergence profiles independent of the number of harmonics. An adjoint solver is also developed in order to perform aeroelastic optimizations with dynamic objective functions and constraints. This TSM solver is evaluated for the NACA64A010 airfoil in transonic inviscid flows. Responses to harmonic pitching motions and to gusts are first computed and compared to unsteady simulations for both rigid and deforming meshes. The computation of the gradient of the unsteady pressure drag with respect to shape parameters is then validated against finite differences.

Read the full paper here

Email
Print
LinkedIn
The paper above was part of  proceedings of a CEAS event and as such the author has signed a publication agreement to have their paper published in the repository. In the case this paper is found somewhere else CEAS always links to the other source.  CEAS takes great care in making the correct content available to the reader. If any mistakes are found  in the listings please contact us directly at papers@aerospacerepository.org and we will correct the listing promptly.  CEAS cannot be held liable either for mistakes in editorial or technical aspects, nor for omissions, nor for the correctness of the content. In particular, CEAS does not guarantee completeness or correctness of information contained in external websites which can be accessed via links from CEAS’s websites. Despite accurate research on the content of such linked external websites, CEAS cannot be held liable for their content. Only the content providers of such external sites are liable for their content. Should you notice any mistake in technical or editorial aspects of the CEAS site, please do not hesitate to inform us.