Felix Stalla, Thiemo M. Kier, Gertjan Looye, Kolja Michel, Thomas G. Schmidt, Charlotte Hanke, Johannes Dillinger, Markus Ritter, Martin Tang

DOI Number: N/A

Conference number: IFASD-2024-107

Increasing efficiency is at the core of next generation aircraft development. Aerodynamics can be improved by high aspect ratio wings, but as these wings are more susceptible
to loads from gusts and maneuvers, structural weight might increase. Active load control enables the use of high aspect ratio wings while maintaining a relatively low structural weight. To enhance the technology readiness of such secondary flight control functions, experiments are indispensable. This paper describes the wind tunnel testing of a gust load alleviation controller on a flexible swept wing, equipped with multiple trailing edge flaps and acceleration sensors. Disturbances are injected by a gust generator located upstream of the model. The complete process leading up to the active control experiment is outlined: the simulation model used for controller development, the experimental identification of the system and updating of said model, the controller design, and the validation in the wind tunnel. μ-synthesis robust control is used, achieving the best possible performance with respect to the uncertainties in the system. The robust controller achieves a significant load reduction of up to 80% in the wind tunnel tests.

Read the full paper here

Email
Print
LinkedIn
The paper above was part of  proceedings of a CEAS event and as such the author has signed a publication agreement to have their paper published in the repository. In the case this paper is found somewhere else CEAS always links to the other source.  CEAS takes great care in making the correct content available to the reader. If any mistakes are found  in the listings please contact us directly at papers@aerospacerepository.org and we will correct the listing promptly.  CEAS cannot be held liable either for mistakes in editorial or technical aspects, nor for omissions, nor for the correctness of the content. In particular, CEAS does not guarantee completeness or correctness of information contained in external websites which can be accessed via links from CEAS’s websites. Despite accurate research on the content of such linked external websites, CEAS cannot be held liable for their content. Only the content providers of such external sites are liable for their content. Should you notice any mistake in technical or editorial aspects of the CEAS site, please do not hesitate to inform us.