Hamad Almarzooqi, Rafic Ajaj, Wesley Cantwell

DOI Number: N/A

Conference number: IFASD-2024-100

The aviation industry is increasingly adopting high aspect ratio (AR) wings to meet the demands for more efficient and emission-friendly aircraft. High AR wings increase aerody-
namic efficiency but come at the cost of structural and aeroelastic issues. A candidate solution for these aeroelastic issues is strut-bracing. This paper conducts a comprehensive parametric study on a high aspect-ratio (AR = 16) strut-braced flat plate to identify the influence of material and geometric parameters on structural performance and aeroelastic stability. The finite element method is used for structural modelling, the doublet lattice method for aerodynamic modelling, and an infinite plate spline for aero-structural coupling. The analysis is conducted using MSC Nastran and MATLAB. The geometric variables include the location of the strut on the plate, the location of the strut on the fuselage, and boundary conditions on strut ends. The material of the plate is then changed from Aluminum-2024 to Carbon Fibre Reinforced Plastic composite, and the ply orientation and layup are also varied. The location of the strut on the plate is varied chordwise and spanwise, while the location of the strut on the fuselage is either fixed at mid-chord or variable with the location of the strut on the wing. The boundary conditions on the strut end (fuselage-wing) are varied between clamped and pinned (4 combinations). The optimum geometric parameters for the metal plate are found to be clamped-integral boundary conditions, with the variable location on the fuselage. The optimum geometric parameters are applied to the composite plate, and the ply orientation and strut location on the plate are studied. The optimum has a ply layup of [0, 45◦]s, and a strut location at 20-30% of the span, and
30-50% of the chord. This results in a 37% increase in the critical speed, a 71.5% decrease in the max bending moment and 21.35% decrease in shear forces.

Read the full paper here

Email
Print
LinkedIn
The paper above was part of  proceedings of a CEAS event and as such the author has signed a publication agreement to have their paper published in the repository. In the case this paper is found somewhere else CEAS always links to the other source.  CEAS takes great care in making the correct content available to the reader. If any mistakes are found  in the listings please contact us directly at papers@aerospacerepository.org and we will correct the listing promptly.  CEAS cannot be held liable either for mistakes in editorial or technical aspects, nor for omissions, nor for the correctness of the content. In particular, CEAS does not guarantee completeness or correctness of information contained in external websites which can be accessed via links from CEAS’s websites. Despite accurate research on the content of such linked external websites, CEAS cannot be held liable for their content. Only the content providers of such external sites are liable for their content. Should you notice any mistake in technical or editorial aspects of the CEAS site, please do not hesitate to inform us.