Keith Soal, Jan Schwochow, Robin Volkmar, Martin Tang, Carsten Thiem, Yves Govers, Marc Böswald, Thiemo Kier, Özge Süelözgen, Nicolas Guerin, Daniel Teubl, Julius Bartasevicius, Balint Vanek, Szabolcs Toth, Misi Nagy

DOI Number: N/A

Conference number: IFASD-2024-119

Flutter flight testing is an important, challenging and safety critical part of aircraft flight envelope expansion. Since flutter is a complex phenomenon influenced by aerodynamics, structural dynamics, and control systems, understanding and modeling these interactions accurately can be difficult. Furthermore, the prediction of the flutter boundary is challenging (both numerically and in flight) due to the interaction of many variables such as airspeed, altitude, control surface positions, excitation amplitudes etc. The critical parameter for flutter monitoring is the aeroelastic damping. The damping also remains the most difficult parameter to identify and simulate accurately. In order to demonstrate state-of-the-art testing, simulation and active control methods, a technology demonstrator was designed and built in the EU FLIPASED project. The UAV demonstrator with 7 m wing span and weighing 70 kg was designed to flutter in the achievable flight envelope. Ground Vibration Testing GVT was conducted, and the results were used to perform a flutter simulation. A flutter flight test campaign was then carried out with Operational Modal Analysis OMA running in real time on miniaturized hardware to identify and track the modal
parameters. In this paper an overview of the flutter monitoring system will be presented, together with the simulation results and flutter flight test results. Finally, a comparison of the
flight test and simulation results will be presented, together with the outlook of future work.

Read the full paper here

Email
Print
LinkedIn
The paper above was part of  proceedings of a CEAS event and as such the author has signed a publication agreement to have their paper published in the repository. In the case this paper is found somewhere else CEAS always links to the other source.  CEAS takes great care in making the correct content available to the reader. If any mistakes are found  in the listings please contact us directly at papers@aerospacerepository.org and we will correct the listing promptly.  CEAS cannot be held liable either for mistakes in editorial or technical aspects, nor for omissions, nor for the correctness of the content. In particular, CEAS does not guarantee completeness or correctness of information contained in external websites which can be accessed via links from CEAS’s websites. Despite accurate research on the content of such linked external websites, CEAS cannot be held liable for their content. Only the content providers of such external sites are liable for their content. Should you notice any mistake in technical or editorial aspects of the CEAS site, please do not hesitate to inform us.