Vitor Borges Santos, Breno Soares da Costa Vieira, Flávio Luiz Cardoso-Ribeiro, Antônio Bernardo Guimarães Neto

DOI Number: N/A

Conference number: IFASD-2024-132

The renaissance of neural networks in the scientific community in recent years has brought new perspectives for improving the computational efficiency of traditional model-
ing techniques. Hamiltonian neural networks leverage the energy-preserving properties of the Hamiltonian formalism to provide surrogate models with increased interpretability compared to conventional feed-forward models. In this study, we employ a lumped-mass multibody method to derive the equations of motion of two highly flexible structures. We perform a model order reduction via modal decomposition while preserving the nonlinearities with the use of exact kinematic relations. After validating full- and reduced-order models, we use them to produce datasets and train the neural networks, which serve as ready-to-use surrogate models. Preliminary findings show that the surrogate models based on neural networks can significantly reduce the time necessary to simulate the free response of the structures. Furthermore, we demonstrate that surrogate models based on Hamiltonian neural networks have energy-preserving capabilities, maintaining accuracy levels even for long simulations. Due to their architecture, when external loads are considered, the surrogate models require the analytical calculation of the generalized forces, jeopardizing the efficiency gains obtained by our approach. We also present
initial findings on the use of neural networks for faster aerodynamic models for flexible aircraft, particularly as surrogate models for the vortex-lattice method. By using a neural network as the aerodynamic surrogate model in a specific flexible aircraft simulation framework, the computational costs were reduced by a factor of 100 on average. The outcomes of this study demonstrate that surrogate models based on neural networks can soon become an efficient and reliable alternative for modeling arbitrarily flexible aircraft, provided the current limitations are addressed.

Read the full paper here

Email
Print
LinkedIn
The paper above was part of  proceedings of a CEAS event and as such the author has signed a publication agreement to have their paper published in the repository. In the case this paper is found somewhere else CEAS always links to the other source.  CEAS takes great care in making the correct content available to the reader. If any mistakes are found  in the listings please contact us directly at papers@aerospacerepository.org and we will correct the listing promptly.  CEAS cannot be held liable either for mistakes in editorial or technical aspects, nor for omissions, nor for the correctness of the content. In particular, CEAS does not guarantee completeness or correctness of information contained in external websites which can be accessed via links from CEAS’s websites. Despite accurate research on the content of such linked external websites, CEAS cannot be held liable for their content. Only the content providers of such external sites are liable for their content. Should you notice any mistake in technical or editorial aspects of the CEAS site, please do not hesitate to inform us.