Amanda Perroni, Breno Castro, Eduardo Krupa, Jens Neumann, Manoela Lima, Marlus Kerninski, Michelle Westin

DOI Number: N/A

Conference number: IFASD-2024-159

A half-span wing was designed for wind tunnel test for verification of aeroelastic characteristics in 2017. This wing was quite flexible and fitted with a pylon and a flow thru nacelle,
to represent the geometry and mass distribution of real-life aircraft, but without propulsion effects, see Fig.1. The wind tunnel used in 2017 for aeroelastic tests was the DNW-HST in Amsterdam, The Netherlands. The test was split in two parts: the first campaign focused on wing deflection for each test point and on how the flexibility affected the flutter characteristics. The second part was dedicated to higher Mach numbers and low angles of attack to verify the effect of both flexibility and shock waves on the aeroelastic characteristics of the system. The wind tunnel test instrumentation included steady and unsteady pressure taps, accelerometers, strain gauges, stereo pattern recognition, and others. All wind tunnel measurements were in good agreement to the computational results, obtained by using traditional tools, such as Nastran. However, for the second entry, considering Mach numbers from 0.75 to 0.90, the behaviour of both damping and frequency are slightly different from the computational analysis, especially for the first five aeroelastic modes. The results were obtained for three different configurations by varying the wing tip mass. Since there are some differences between the experimental and computational results for the transonic regime, further analysis is performed to explore the effects of aerodynamic nonlinearities. To investigate it in more detail, analyses using different computational tools for the transonic unsteady aerodynamics from Embraer and DLR is used in the present paper and compared with the experimental results obtained in 2017. The focus is to use high fidelity methodologies based on coupled CFD/CSM-methods (computational fluid dynamics, computational structure mechanics) for the flexible model to better capture nonlinear phenomena that might be occurring during the wind tunnel tests.

Read the full paper here

Email
Print
LinkedIn
The paper above was part of  proceedings of a CEAS event and as such the author has signed a publication agreement to have their paper published in the repository. In the case this paper is found somewhere else CEAS always links to the other source.  CEAS takes great care in making the correct content available to the reader. If any mistakes are found  in the listings please contact us directly at papers@aerospacerepository.org and we will correct the listing promptly.  CEAS cannot be held liable either for mistakes in editorial or technical aspects, nor for omissions, nor for the correctness of the content. In particular, CEAS does not guarantee completeness or correctness of information contained in external websites which can be accessed via links from CEAS’s websites. Despite accurate research on the content of such linked external websites, CEAS cannot be held liable for their content. Only the content providers of such external sites are liable for their content. Should you notice any mistake in technical or editorial aspects of the CEAS site, please do not hesitate to inform us.