Vincent de Gaudemaris, Jean-Sébastien Schotté, Antoine Placzek, Laurent Blanc, Fabrice Thouverez

DOI Number: N/A

Conference number: IFASD-2024-150

The next generation of propeller-driven aircraft raises new concerns about their stability regarding the whirl flutter phenomenon. This instability has to be evaluated early in
the design phase, thereby raising a need for fast and robust prediction methods. The key to analyzing such instability is the modeling of the motion-induced aerodynamic loads on the propeller. This paper proposes to build and compare different aerodynamic modeling methods ranging from low- to mid-fidelity. The comparison of the resulting stability boundaries shows that certain low-fidelity models give results close to mid-fidelity, emphasizing the advantages of these fast low-fidelity methods for the whirl flutter prediction. The interest of mid-fidelity modeling techniques in the study of non-conventional situations is also looked at. In particular, the occurrence of whirl flutter under non-axial flow is studied. The obtained stability boundaries highlight a slight stabilizing influence, demonstrating that the axial flight situation remains a conservative framework for whirl flutter studies.

Read the full paper here

Email
Print
LinkedIn
The paper above was part of  proceedings of a CEAS event and as such the author has signed a publication agreement to have their paper published in the repository. In the case this paper is found somewhere else CEAS always links to the other source.  CEAS takes great care in making the correct content available to the reader. If any mistakes are found  in the listings please contact us directly at papers@aerospacerepository.org and we will correct the listing promptly.  CEAS cannot be held liable either for mistakes in editorial or technical aspects, nor for omissions, nor for the correctness of the content. In particular, CEAS does not guarantee completeness or correctness of information contained in external websites which can be accessed via links from CEAS’s websites. Despite accurate research on the content of such linked external websites, CEAS cannot be held liable for their content. Only the content providers of such external sites are liable for their content. Should you notice any mistake in technical or editorial aspects of the CEAS site, please do not hesitate to inform us.