Ana Cristine Meinicke, Carlos Cesnik, Brianna Blocher, Aditya Panigrahi, Jayant Sirohi, Noel Clemens

DOI Number: N/A

Conference number: IFASD-2024-185

Recovery of in-flight loads is crucial for guidance, navigation, and control. The harsh aerothermal conditions experienced in hypersonic flight provide additional challenges for
conventional sensors typically installed on the outer surface of the structure. This study investigates a novel vehicle-as-a-sensor concept, where internal measurements of the vehicle’s deformed state are used to infer the loading it is subjected to. The proposed inverse model for this problem consists of a neural network, where strain measured through fiber optic sensors characterizes the deformed state and is used as an input to the machine learning algorithm which outputs the load state. An experimental testbed consisting of an aluminum scaled representative version of the IC3X, a slender hypersonic vehicle, is used as a proof of concept. A finite element model is developed and verified against results of a ground vibration test. The testbed is instrumented with fiber optic strain sensors along the length of the vehicle and force is applied through four actuators attached to load cells. Several static loading cases consisting of combinations of the various actuators are used to evaluate discrepancies between the as-built structure’s response and the predictions from the model. Calibration factors are applied to the model strain results to account for manufacturing of the aluminum model and sensor installa-
tion uncertainties, such as thickness of the adhesive layer used to attach the optical fibers to the model surface. The neural network is trained with data consisting of numerical load and strain pairs under conditions spanning those of the experiment. The neural network-based inverse model is validated against the experimental data and compared with a Data-Driven Force Reconstruction method that assumes a linear relation between strain and force. Errors on load recovery given the strain measurements are quantified.

Read the full paper here

Email
Print
LinkedIn
The paper above was part of  proceedings of a CEAS event and as such the author has signed a publication agreement to have their paper published in the repository. In the case this paper is found somewhere else CEAS always links to the other source.  CEAS takes great care in making the correct content available to the reader. If any mistakes are found  in the listings please contact us directly at papers@aerospacerepository.org and we will correct the listing promptly.  CEAS cannot be held liable either for mistakes in editorial or technical aspects, nor for omissions, nor for the correctness of the content. In particular, CEAS does not guarantee completeness or correctness of information contained in external websites which can be accessed via links from CEAS’s websites. Despite accurate research on the content of such linked external websites, CEAS cannot be held liable for their content. Only the content providers of such external sites are liable for their content. Should you notice any mistake in technical or editorial aspects of the CEAS site, please do not hesitate to inform us.