Nicolas Guérin, Keith Soal, Cyrille Stephan, Martin Tang, Pascal Lubrina, Robin Volkmar, Yves Govers, Julius Bartasevicius, Daniel Teubl, Szabolcs Toth, Thiemo Kier, Balint Vanek

DOI Number: N/A

Conference number: IFASD-2024-190

With the everlasting reach for lighter and more fuel-efficient aircraft structures, aircraft designs become more and more flexible. This leads to both increased deformation of the
airframe under aerodynamic load, as well as more coupling between the structural static and dynamic behaviour and the surrounding airflow, potentially leading to the dreaded phenomenon of flutter. This dangerous behaviour has limited potential aircraft design optimization, hence impaired carbon footprint reduction. In order to circumvent this constraint, active flutter suppression through fast actuators and control surfaces was investigated during the FLEXOP and subsequent FliPASED projects, on a research high aspect ratio fixed wing UAV. Such control strategies, though of great interest thanks to their capability to control a wide variety of behaviour, also come with great risks if badly designed. They must therefore be conceived with very good knowledge of the controlled structure, as well as properly verified through an extensive test phase. This paper focuses on the identification of the structural dynamic behaviour of the FliPASED P-FLEX UAV during a Ground Vibration Test (GVT) campaign. The paper presents the GVT organization, from instrumentation to analysis, including test configurations accounting for high-bandwidth actuators as well as devices, designed to help increase or decrease the flutter coupling, so-called flutter stoppers. The paper describes the structural dynamic behaviour of the P-FLEX UAV and the influence of the different mechanical components on this behaviour. Due to multiple specific features of this aircraft including high aspect ratio and custom designed high-bandwidth actuators, this GVT proved difficult to achieve for both organizational and technical reasons. The paper presents the main problems associated with these specific features. Although the P-FLEX UAV is of a peculiar design with respect to commercial aircraft, the
observations made on this aircraft will be of great interest for future civilian aircraft designs that tend towards very high aspect ratio wings equipped with numerous active flutter suppression control surfaces.

Read the full paper here

Email
Print
LinkedIn
The paper above was part of  proceedings of a CEAS event and as such the author has signed a publication agreement to have their paper published in the repository. In the case this paper is found somewhere else CEAS always links to the other source.  CEAS takes great care in making the correct content available to the reader. If any mistakes are found  in the listings please contact us directly at papers@aerospacerepository.org and we will correct the listing promptly.  CEAS cannot be held liable either for mistakes in editorial or technical aspects, nor for omissions, nor for the correctness of the content. In particular, CEAS does not guarantee completeness or correctness of information contained in external websites which can be accessed via links from CEAS’s websites. Despite accurate research on the content of such linked external websites, CEAS cannot be held liable for their content. Only the content providers of such external sites are liable for their content. Should you notice any mistake in technical or editorial aspects of the CEAS site, please do not hesitate to inform us.